At 03:15 AM 7/1/2009, you wrote:
Subject: RE: webOS SDK
From: luis maldonado luis.maldon...@hotmail.com
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:08:43 -0400
This conversation might be inappropriate for this forum but the fact
is that Palm and their arrogance and the way they are thowing away a
group of
And I remember having to sign umpteen forms in triplicate, in order to get a
glimpse of the source code for Palm OS 3.5.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Stringer [mailto:strin...@rf-tp.com]
Sent: 01 July 2009 16:24
To: Palm Developer Forum
Subject: RE: webOS SDK
At 03:15 AM 7/1/2009, you
Philip Sheard wrote:
And I remember having to sign umpteen forms in triplicate, in order to get a
glimpse of the source code for Palm OS 3.5.
Because OS source code == sdk.
Ryan
--
For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please
see
I was around when the original Palm Pilot was introduced, and my memory
(fallible, I'll admit) is that the development kit was not distributed until
about 3 months after the device hit store shelves. And when we tried to use
that first version it was far from perfect. The Pre hit shelves when,
Well, Luis seems to be upset that Palm seems to be favoring a few large
developers by giving them a runaway lead in developing for the Pre, while us
smalltime but feriously loyal developers, were completely IGNORED, with not
even a glimpse or a passing mention.
--
For information on using the
Yes, that pisses me off too.
-Original Message-
From: Lionscribe [mailto:lionscr...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 July 2009 21:56
To: Palm Developer Forum
Subject: Re: webOS SDK
Well, Luis seems to be upset that Palm seems to be favoring a few large
developers by giving them a runaway lead in
Amen,
Luis.
From: shea...@tiscali.co.uk
To: palm-dev-forum@news.palmos.com
Subject: RE: webOS SDK
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:01:34 +0100
Yes, that pisses me off too.
-Original Message-
From: Lionscribe [mailto:lionscr...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 July 2009 21:56
To: Palm
Lee,
What I mean by ARRORGANCE is the fact that we who have been developing for the
palm platform since they came out with the first pilot have been COMPLETLY
IGNORED. Technology comes and goes, and I also go back to the keypunch days and
sill have a box of 80 column cards in my office to
luis maldonado wrote:
I have a product which was doing well with the TX in the restaurant
business and was hoping there would an extension or hand of in their
handeld devices to some other company willing to create the NON-PHONE
devices as there is a business in that area. At least Apple in
I understand, but there are several points:
1. I don't think Palm was selling enough Tungsten models for it to be a
profitable business, and it certainly was dwindling. They are not the first
to exit the low-end PDA market, just the biggest.
2. For the first 5 years of their existence they
Since it doesn't seem to be making much head way, I still wish Access would
just open source things on the Garnet OS / Palm OS and let the die hard
developed continue to work on the platform. Or sell it off to someone who
would open source it.
Heck...even have the Cobalt version be released
11 matches
Mail list logo
