On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 08:57:40AM +0300, Dan Patrutiu wrote:
Ben Combee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Actually, the Lesser GNU Public Licence (LGPL) is more stringent than
that. One of the goals of the LGPL is that you must give the user freedom
to update the library and relink the program to a
John is making a really important point here that I would like to
emphasize and expand upon. Regardless of _how_ you use an application or
library you _are_ bound by the licence for that piece of software and
should read the licence and make sure that you understand it, otherwise
how can you
At 08:57 2003-4-1 +0300, you wrote:
I understood, but the thing is I don't suppose to change it! So let's
say I need 5 functions from the library. That's all. Can I simply include
the code for those functions in my project and put the credits in the about
box, or what should I exactly do? The
Yes, it seems this is the best solution. I downloaded the FDLIBM files I
need and it seems it's very easy to port them (I only need 5 functions as I
said). On the other side, the MathLib itself files are very close to those
files, because FDLIBM is the source for MathLib. So it seems the
Is there a way to finally include MathLib in my executable? I know this
is not a good idea because more copies of the same code can reside in
memory, but it's not a good thing to distribute a program together with
let's say 3 shared libraries.
On the other side, is it legal to include it?
Is there a way to finally include MathLib in my executable? I know
this
is not a good idea because more copies of the same code can reside in
memory, but it's not a good thing to distribute a program together with
let's say 3 shared libraries.
you can include the library as a resource and
That means I will waste 50 more kilobytes from the storage memory. This
may be not a bad idea, but I am sure it can be included in other way,
eventually the sources. Think I need more references on this.
Is there a way to finally include MathLib in my executable? I know
this
is not a
And about ZLib, I read somewhere that the library is built for use on
GCC. Is there anybody who used it on CW ?
SysZLib is a system shared library and can be used with any tool that can
call system shared libraries, including CodeWarrior and GCC.
--
Ben Combee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CodeWarrior
At 14:45 2003-3-31 +0200, you wrote:
On the other side, is it legal to include it?
the mathlib website explicitly states that you can do whatever you want
with
the library... yes you can redistribute it.
a little correction: MathLib falls under the LGPL - that means you can
redistribute
I understood, but the thing is I don't suppose to change it! So let's
say I need 5 functions from the library. That's all. Can I simply include
the code for those functions in my project and put the credits in the about
box, or what should I exactly do? The project will be commercial and I
Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: Include MathLib in a project
I understood, but the thing is I don't suppose to change it! So let's
say I need 5 functions from the library. That's all. Can I simply include
the code for those functions in my project
On the other side, is it legal to include it?
the mathlib website explicitly states that you can do whatever you want
with
the library... yes you can redistribute it.
a little correction: MathLib falls under the LGPL - that means you can
redistribute MathLib without GPLing your own
12 matches
Mail list logo
