>>Might be a problem in your settings.
>Try creating a new project using
>>the wizard. Try compiling it. See if
>you still have the problem.
The wizard seems to do the job. I was trying to change both the linker as well
as the number of segments at one shot. I have let the linker be. Now I have a
>>There is no need to switch linkers just for multiple segment support
>>unless what you need to divide is a PNO or other resources and >you're
>>relying on the SBIN splitting that the Palm OS Linker does.
Thanks for your reply. I tried converting my application into multisegments
without changin
Might be a problem in your settings.
Try creating a new project using
the wizard. Try compiling it. See if
you still have the problem.
--
For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please
see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/
>>As for your problem, I never looked
>into it, but if you are using CW, a
>>quick fix should be to create a new target whuch has only your Rsrc >file,
>>link it using the MAC linker, and
>>include the output of that target
>into your main target, which will link
>>with the Palm Linker. This can a
On 6/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been developing my application under the Macintosh 68k linker. Now that
its size is exceeding the single segment limit, I need to convert it into multi
segment. The prerequisite for doing so is that the linker is set to PalmOS 68k.
First of all, there are a number of
command-line tools that do a pretty
good job with converting Rsrc files to
RCP files. With a little work you can
gain all the benefits of PilRC (like
navigation and other objects).
As for your problem, I never looked
into it, but if you are using CW, a
quick fix
I have been developing my application under the Macintosh 68k linker. Now that
its size is exceeding the single segment limit, I need to convert it into multi
segment. The prerequisite for doing so is that the linker is set to PalmOS 68k.
This messes up my resource file, I've noticed.
I first