Dorian Taylor (Lists) wrote:
I sent a message
two weeks ago that didn't get an answer. I rated the "bug" as
"Wishlist". Did I misstep somehow?
No. I think filing your wish as a "wishlist" type bug was perfectly fine.
I do agree with Roderich, though. Adding another option to pp is likely
no
On 25-Aug-10, at 1:36 AM, Dave Howorth wrote:
This is a discussion that belongs on par@perl.org rather than a bug,
isn't it?
I sent a message
two weeks ago that didn't get an answer. I rated the "bug" as
"Wishlist". Did I misstep somehow?
Dorian Taylor via RT wrote:
I propose that PA
Wed Aug 25 05:07:22 2010: Request 59710 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by kalo...@digsys.bg
Queue: PAR-Packer
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #59710] Par-Packer not including all dependencies
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner: RSCHUPP
Requesto
This is a discussion that belongs on par@perl.org rather than a bug,
isn't it?
Dorian Taylor via RT wrote:
>>> I propose that PAR::Packer be given a switch to strip out
>>> architecture-dependent (i.e. XS) modules from the dependency
>>> inclusion list when packing a PAR. If I missed a method of
