Dear list,
Please find attached an XML that will expose vtkImageGaussianSource and
vtkImageMagnitude to ParaView
First of all, vtkImageGaussianSource behaves like it does not produce any
data :
- Add a Gaussian Source to the pipeline,
- Apply
- Then go to the information panel of the objec
For sanity check, what do these return?
scalars->GetValue(i*3+1)
scalars->GetValue(i*3+2)
scalars->GetTuple(i)[1]
scalars->GetTuple(i)[2]
-berk
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Natalie Happenhofer
wrote:
> Hi!
> I´m having trouble retrieving the data from a vector-valued vtkDoubleArray,
> my c
This is actually a great feature request. I am surprised that it is
the first time someone thought of this. Can we target this for 3.8
Utkarsh?
-berk
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
wrote:
> David,
>
> Not currently. I've added a feature request:
> http://paraview.org/Bug/view.
Would it be too painful to compile paraview with debug and to get a
full stack trace? We may also ask you to attach to paraview with a
debugger depending on what the stack looks like.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Peter Brady wrote:
> I don't mean to flood the list but after some investigation
This is why I love the ParaView architecture. I always find myself
surprised by what it can do :-)
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:30 PM, David E DeMarle
wrote:
> In the mean time, you can do it via Tools->Python Shell and this script:
>
> Start up paraview and apply wavelet source for example. Then op
Hi David,
Are you running one of our binaries or did you compile ParaView
yourself? If you compiled it yourself, which version of Qt did you
use. On which platform?
-berk
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:42 PM, David Doria wrote:
> In the Object Inspector, the Data Arrays box is usually about 1 line h
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Berk Geveci wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Are you running one of our binaries or did you compile ParaView
> yourself? If you compiled it yourself, which version of Qt did you
> use. On which platform?
>
> -berk
>
> I am using the latest cvs version. In my cmake settings,
David,
I think this is an issue with Qt 4.5. I noticed the same with Qt 4.4
but Qt 4.3 works fine. We will track this down after the 3.6 release,
when we switch to 4.5.
-berk
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:04 PM, David Doria wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Berk Geveci
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Da
I am trying to make the camera fly around a very large data set. I turned
representation to outline, hoping that would let me setup the animation and
view it quickly (ie without having to wait 10 seconds for it to display each
frame). The idea being that once it looks like it is correctly orbiting
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Berk Geveci wrote:
> David,
>
> I think this is an issue with Qt 4.5. I noticed the same with Qt 4.4
> but Qt 4.3 works fine. We will track this down after the 3.6 release,
> when we switch to 4.5.
>
> -berk
>
> Ok, this one is clearly not a show stopper haha. Is t
I estimate June for 3.6. I don't have an estimate for 3.8 but probably
6-8 months after 3.6.
-berk
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:17 PM, David Doria wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Berk Geveci
> wrote:
>>
>> David,
>>
>> I think this is an issue with Qt 4.5. I noticed the same with Qt 4.4
I think that the outline should render very quickly and is probably the best
way of setting the animation. Is it not doing that? It may be a bug then.
-berk
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:15 PM, David Doria wrote:
> I am trying to make the camera fly around a very large data set. I turned
> represent
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Berk Geveci wrote:
> I think that the outline should render very quickly and is probably the
> best
> way of setting the animation. Is it not doing that? It may be a bug then.
>
> -berk
>
>
Can anyone else confirm or deny this? It goes slightly faster than if I
don
13 matches
Mail list logo
