Re: [Paraview] volumetric glyph

2010-07-08 Thread Ivo Roghair
We are also having this issue. It happens when you use pipeline 2, i.e. make a point source, then apply a glyph (e.g. a box). Then get a clip (or a slice, for that matter), which shows that the box is actually nothing more than an empty shell. We cannot clip before applying the glyph, unfortuna

Re: [Paraview] volumetric glyph

2010-07-08 Thread Pawel Krupinski
From: Utkarsh Ayachit To: Pawel Krupinski Cc: paraview@paraview.org Sent: Wed, July 7, 2010 5:44:01 PM Subject: Re: [Paraview] volumetric glyph I want to clip the glyph, that is to use the pipeline 2. Clipping the data is an alternative, but then I want to

[Paraview] Commands for Source Plugin

2010-07-08 Thread owen.arnold
As part of a source plugin I am developing, I would like to provide gui input parameters. Many of the sources in paraview already provide this, such as the Sphere source, which allows properties like radius to be adjusted manually. I have included the IntegerVectorProperty xml fragment (see bel

Re: [Paraview] Commands for Source Plugin

2010-07-08 Thread Jérôme
Hi, First of all, your public virtual function is called 'SetNuberOfXBin' whereas the XML try to find SetNumberOfXBins. If this is a copy/paste from your real code, you would have to check your syntax. Second, the XML describes an IntegerVectorProperty with 10 elements, thus I expected to find a f

Re: [Paraview] text glyph

2010-07-08 Thread David E DeMarle
I'm thinking we should put text labeling in as an auxiliary representation (like cube axis). It will borrow from the info/geo vis representations that downsample and place a readable number of labels. (Side note: Visual clutter is more of a problem than speed. You can only draw a few hundred words

[Paraview] Client side to server side plugin

2010-07-08 Thread Johnson, Duncan (UK)
Hello all, I have some plugins on a linux box that work as client side plugins. I would like to be able to connect to the linux box from a windows box using pvserver and use the existing plugins. I quickly found out that I couldn't just load the existing libraries as server side plugins. What

Re: [Paraview] Client side to server side plugin

2010-07-08 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit
In non-trivial cases, every box needs it's own compilation of the plugin. So you will have to compile the plugin for both windows and linux and then load the appropriate version on each process using the plugin manager. Utkarsh On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Johnson, Duncan (UK) wrote: > Hello

Re: [Paraview] Client side to server side plugin

2010-07-08 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit
If it's just a reader without any custom GUI panels or Qt resource files then, you can simply load the server side plugin. There's no need to load the plugin on the client-side, in that case. Utkarsh On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Johnson, Duncan (UK) wrote: > > Thanks for your reply Utkarsh,

[Paraview] vtkstd with VS2008 issue

2010-07-08 Thread Fred Fred
Hello, how to cope with the fact using vtkstd:: causes syntax errors on VS2008 while it works well on g++? p = vtkstd::lower_bound(start, end, *it, vtkstd::less()); error C2039: 'lower_bound' : is not a member of 'std'

Re: [Paraview] vtkstd with VS2008 issue

2010-07-08 Thread Dave Partyka
Use this instead. #include // lower_bound vtksys_stl::lower_bound( On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Fred Fred wrote: > Hello, > how to cope with the fact using vtkstd:: causes syntax errors on VS2008 > while it works well on g++? > > p = vtkstd::lower_bound(start, end, *it, vtkstd::les

[Paraview] Displaying strong discontinuities/XFEM

2010-07-08 Thread nhodge
All: I have done a bunch of searching on google, as well as the list archives. The results I have found are 3-4 years old, so I thought I would ask this question, to see if the answer is now different . . . How does one display strong discontinuities? By "strong", I mean discontinuities in

Re: [Paraview] vtkstd with VS2008 issue

2010-07-08 Thread Dave Partyka
Or If you prefer to use vtkstd instead of vtksys (Don't ask me what is different between them). Did you include #include ? On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Dave Partyka wrote: > Use this instead. > > #include // lower_bound > > vtksys_stl::lower_bound( > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Fr

Re: [Paraview] vtkstd with VS2008 issue

2010-07-08 Thread Aashish Chaudhary
Sorry missed reply to all On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Aashish Chaudhary < aashish.chaudh...@kitware.com> wrote: > Did you include algorithm? > > #include > > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Fred Fred wrote: > >> Hello, >> how to cope with the fact using vtkstd:: causes syntax errors

Re: [Paraview] vtkstd with VS2008 issue

2010-07-08 Thread Fred Fred
Thx all of you. I actually did not include algorithm.h but since everything went fine with g++ I simply did never realize that something was missing. From: dave.part...@kitware.com Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 11:25:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [Paraview] vtkstd with VS2008 issue To: stan1...@hotmail.fr CC: p

Re: [Paraview] VTK version

2010-07-08 Thread François Bissey
> It is 5.6.0 + some additional patches as VTK 5.6.0 was released before > ParaView 3.8.0 was finished. If you checkout the VTK release branch. The > commit ParaView 3.8.0 used was: > > 8b2449871dca83d542cc7d8093da5fee3c70ebb1 > > Author: Dave DeMarle 2010-05-19 14:25:56 > Committer: David Part

[Paraview] External execution of python code related to paraview

2010-07-08 Thread rhushabh
Hi, Thanks a lot for all the help given before. Please could you tell me that can I open run the python code from outside paraview (without opening any instance of paraview), and get the output images(snapshots/full 3-D images) after execution of the code. Thank You in advance Rhushabh Bha