good point, 3.98.0. they're dying after the splash screen before the gui
gets open.
On Mar 26, 2013 2:27 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com
wrote:
Are you using the 3.98.1 or 3.98.0 binaries?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Burlen Loring blor...@lbl.gov wrote:
Hi All,
The
So this all relates to Mountain Lion having issues with a large number of
dylibs being loaded at runtime. The 3.98.1 release needs to be used on
Mountain Lion, as we dramatically
reduced the number of dylibs be squashing all the Client/Server bindings
into a single library.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013
So maybe a warning for the 3.98.0 release posted on the web page that they are
NOT compatible with OS X 10.8? And just for my own edification why is there
both 3.98 and 3.98.1? What is the difference between them?
--
Mike Jackson www.bluequartz.net
On Mar 27, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Robert Maynard
For 3.98.0, we offered two different variants of the OsX binaries, one
for 10.6-10.7 (ParaView-3.98.0-OSX-10.6-10.7-64bit.dmg) and another
one for 10.8 (ParaView-3.98.0-OSX-10.8-64bit.dmg). We addressed the
issue with libraries with 3.98.1 and hence only 1 binary for 10.6-10.8
is offerred for
Yes, that clarifies things but if 3.98.1 runs on 10.6.8 up through 10.8.3 then
and the library loading was corrected in the 3.98.1 version why is the 3.98.0
version still available? Maybe I am just being dense today.
--
Mike Jackson www.bluequartz.net
On Mar 27, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Utkarsh
Personally I don't recommend using the 3.98.0 Mountain Lions specific
binaries at all. As the application will break when installed into a custom
location with a decently long file path.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Michael Jackson
mike.jack...@bluequartz.net wrote:
Yes, that clarifies
Great, thanks for all the feedback. I think we're OK mixing 3.98.0 and
3.98.1 client server builds, until we roll out 3.98.1 on the servers.
On Mar 27, 2013 10:38 AM, Robert Maynard robert.mayn...@kitware.com
wrote:
So this all relates to Mountain Lion having issues with a large number of
Hi Lucas,
Do you mind if I use the coproc files you sent me as an example for
Catalyst?
Thanks,
Andy
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Andy Bauer andy.ba...@kitware.com wrote:
Hi Lucas,
I was able to replicate your issue on the mac. There is a fix for it that
is waiting a code review and
Hi Andy,
I do not mind at all.
In fact, I am quite happy to have contributed something given all the help that
you have provided to us.
Thanks,
Lucas
From: Andy Bauer [andy.ba...@kitware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 3:31 PM
To: paraview@paraview.org;
