Hello,
I have two HDF5 (in the *h5 format) for each time step. I have an *xmf file
to read the h5 file in paraview. I know how to make a movie using the xmf
file with just one *h5 file at each time step. But I am not able to plot it
using Paraview for multiple files at each time step. The current
Hi Everyone,
Is there a python method for exporting scenes (say to vtk/webgl/x3d) in
Paraview?
Thanks,
Paul
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep mess
Hi Paul,
I'm not sure the Alpha is supported in our current implementation.
Seb
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Paul Graham wrote:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> Thanks for your instructions, they were very helpful. I basically changed
> drawScene() to render just one scene in the cache (rather than a
Hi Sebastien,
Thanks for your instructions, they were very helpful. I basically changed
drawScene() to render just one scene in the cache (rather than all of them)
and the animation is working.
Now I have to try and figure out why the alpha levels are not working.
Paul
On 21 October 2013 1
Hello Dominik
It looks like maybe you haven't provided enough information to Paraview
about your Topology. You've set the TopologyType to Mixed, but this is for
a mixture of elements of different types, whereas you actually only have
one single element of a single type.
Looking at xdmf.org, it lo
Hi Hong,
pvserver is NOT needed in order for the ParaView client GUI to connect live
to a Catalyst enabled simulation run. In certain cases users may want to be
able to connect a client to a separate pvserver and have that server
connect to a Catalyst enabled simulation. I haven't tried that but S
Hi Andy,
A quick related question to confirm with you: for the Catalyst live mode to
work, is pvserver process needed in between for the PV client to communicate
with Catalyst enabled simulation? In other words, do I need to run two jobs on
HPC, one is Catalyst enabled simulation, the other is
Hi,
The Catalyst live mode is still beta functionality. The client does connect
to the Catalyst enabled simulation directly. You have to keep in mind that
there's a pipeline on the server and a separate pipeline on the client.
Essentially the pipeline on the client uses the requested filter output
Dear all,
I'm new to Catalyst. I'm wondering how does the live mode work.
In my understanding, the simulation is modified to call Catalyst library
which can get pre-processed information from a python script file. The
simulation also connects to paraview client directly. It means that there
is no
Thanks the issue seems to be related to picking. I guess this is a bug that
will need to be looked into.
Seb
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Сергей Дмитриев wrote:
> Hello all my actions on this video.
>
> Or on following link: http://youtu.be/c1CvUS1L5pY
>
> What can u say about this?
>
>
> _
Hi Pawel,
I think for 1) you put a data-dir that contains too much files hence a
complain about a text message too large.
For 2, you can change to command line with an argument that contain the
file to load instead of a directory.
Seb
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Pawel Kwiecien wrote:
>
Tony,
I think this should fix it http://review.source.kitware.com/#/t/3462/
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Tony McDaniel wrote:
> I was able to reproduce this error in Paraview 3.98.1 64-bit on MacOS X
> 10.8.5 with the following code:
>
> s = Sphere()
> c = Contour()
> Delete(c)
>
> Which r
I was able to reproduce this error in Paraview 3.98.1 64-bit on MacOS X
10.8.5 with the following code:
s = Sphere()
c = Contour()
Delete(c)
Which returns the error:
ERROR: In
/Users/kitware/Dashboards/MyTests/NightlyMaster/ParaViewSuperbuild-Release/paraview/src/paraview/ParaViewCore/ServerM
Looks like a bug to me. The script seems totally reasonable.
Utkarsh
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Casey Goodlett
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am having receiving error messages with the 4.0.1 release of paraview as
> well as a recent build of master when deleting objects that are part of a
> pipe
I have received no feedback to my question. Did I overlook something
obvious and it means that there are better / more popular formats for
such datasets supported by ParaView?
Regards,
Dominik
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Dominik Szczerba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am unable to load the following tri
Hi all,
I am having receiving error messages with the 4.0.1 release of paraview as
well as a recent build of master when deleting objects that are part of a
pipeline. The following code snippet gives an an error message.
from paraview import simple as smp
s = smp.Sphere()
smp.Show(s)
smp.Render
Hi Gek,
usually the proper deployment of ParaViewWeb rely on a SessionManager as a
web front-end that will automatically start as many pvpython ... process as
users connect to it for 3d visualizations.
Unfortunately that does not seems to be what you would like. What you ask
though, should be pos
It was submitted in a bug report iirc as a dataset that exposed a
failure to enable zlib support withing XDMF. That is all I know of the
dataset.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:22 PM, David E DeMarle
wrote:
> Robert Maynard may know.
>
> commit 4ec5cd1c31c80ec03b92247a767416495a6a3f9f
> Author: Robert
Hello,
For the programmable filter, there's a property named "Output Data Set
Type" that you can set using the Properties panel. By default it;s set
to "Same as Input". Look at your script, it looks like your input
dataset is multiblock dataset, comprising of multiple blocks. If you
let the output
Hello all my actions on this video.
Or on following link: http://youtu.be/c1CvUS1L5pY
What can u say about this?
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep
20 matches
Mail list logo
