Re: [Paraview] python error when importing paraview.simple with paraview 5.0

So I'm using wrapper files, described here to add the directory to my LD_LIBRARY_PATH where necessary. Not a great solution, but it's sufficient for now On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 12:04 sean read wr

Re: [Paraview] couple of issues related with co-processing ...

Hi, You can download the Catalyst script from following link, https://www.dropbox.com/s/eajs9dm0of5b4bi/script_data.tar.gz?dl=0 I also included the data and ParaView state that is used to create the Catalyst script. So, it might help to find the problem. Thanks, --ufuk > I haven't seen issues

[Paraview] VRUI vs. VRPN

Hi guys, Wondering if there are any advantages/disadvantages of using one over the other. We have Paraview5.0 running on Ubuntu driving a 4 walled CAVE. Any suggestions? -- Faiz Abidi | Master's Student at Virginia Tech | www.faizabidi.com | +1-540-998-6636 ___

Re: [Paraview] VRUI vs. VRPN

No real advantages or disadvantages. If you are using VRPN for handling tracking now. Then use VRPN. If not, you could use Vrui for ParaView and take advantage of other Vrui applications by KeckCaves, Oliver Kreylos, and Idaho National Laboratory. I personally don't like configure multiple trackin

Re: [Paraview] VRUI vs. VRPN

How did you all make out with the passive stereo connection Faiz? On Apr 16, 2016 12:31 PM, "Faiz Abidi" wrote: > Hi guys, > > Wondering if there are any advantages/disadvantages of using one over the > other. We have Paraview5.0 running on Ubuntu driving a 4 walled CAVE. Any > suggestions? > --

Re: [Paraview] VRUI vs. VRPN

Thanks for the reply, Patrick. We have temporarily put that on hold, David. Will probably resume that next month. On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 3:27 PM, David E DeMarle wrote: > How did you all make out with the passive stereo connection Faiz? > On Apr 16, 2016 12:31 PM, "Faiz Abidi" wrote: > >> Hi