Hi Tim,
I am not sure about the non-blocking type communication is supported by
ParaView, Catalyst or not but i think that assigning an extra core for
global reduction is possible. You could use MPI communication for this
purpose. So, look at following code of mine for overloaded
coprocessori
Ken,
I might be a little dense here, but I missed the part where I clip the truss
elements by the surface of the solid before writing them out.
Dennis
From: Moreland, Kenneth [mailto:kmo...@sandia.gov]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 5:33 PM
To: Dennis Conklin ; Paraview
(paraview@paraview.org)
Is there a way to project a 2D, or 3D polygon onto a surface.
Specifically I have some elevation data, that is displaying fine. But the data
has a lot of vertical variation. I have a polygon that represents the
boundaries of different regions. So, the polygon is effectively 2D. Although,
I c
Hi Adam
I think the Slice Along Polyline Filter is what you need. Just select the data
set and the poly line in the window popping up and then proceed in the
properties section as usual.
Cheers
Venke
> Adam Dershowitz hat am 25. Oktober 2016 um 16:01
> geschrieben:
>
>
> Is there a way to p
I don't think that will do it. Because, I don't want to slice anything.
I just want to show the boundaries on the 3D surface. I want to project the
polygon that marks the edges of a region, onto the 3D topography.
It seems that Slice Along Polyline uses a laser to cut a section of the
surface
OK, I think I misinterpreted your question. I thought you were asking how to
extract the truss part out of a blob of elements. I guess you are asking to
clip one set of elements (the truss) with another set of elements (the blob).
I don’t think there is any way of clipping the truss by a surface
Hello,
I have a programmable filter that is wrapped into a custom plugin using an XML
configuration file. If I use the GUI and go to the Manage Plugins and load it,
everything is fine.
However, I can't figure out how to load it inside pvpython. I am trying to do:
servermanager.ProxyManager(
Hi Tim,
This may be better to do as an in transit set up. This way the processes
would be independent. Through Catalyst I'd worry about all of the processes
waiting on the global rank 0 doing work before all of the other Catalyst
ranks return control to the simulation. Depending on the system you'
Hi Andy,
I'll take a look at the in transit approach. I'm essentially extracting a slice
every N steps and collecting it as a single slice on a single processor each
time, accumulating the slices as I go. Then every M*N steps, I want that single
processor to do an expensive operation and save
Hi Tim,
Yep, you're use case looks like a really good choice to do in transit. As a
start I'd suggest doing the slice in situ with Catalyst, write it out to a
.pvtp file every nth time step and then having a separate process reading
the files in (don't read the nth step until the nth+1 .pvtp file
Adam,
Have you actually tried the filter? Because I think the output is exactly what
you're asking for: the "section" of the surface is the part of the surface where
the polyline is proceted onto it, hence a polyline with the regarding topography
values for the respective z coordinates.
Cheers
Ve
11 matches
Mail list logo