Re: [Paraview] issue about deformed and misplaced color bars ...

Ufuk, In any case, both issues are now fixed in `master` and should be available in the next release candidate. Utkarsh On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit < utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote: > Ufuk, > > I believe the issue you're running into is https://gitlab.kitware.com/ >

Re: [Paraview] Import a four-dimensional array and "slice" one dimension to plot in 3D

Fred, A reader plugin would be perfectly reasonable. Distributing a plugin may not be easier than distributing the programmable source file, though, because it needs to be built with the same tools as the ParaView binary. We don't have a ParaView SDK to build against, so you would have to build

Re: [Paraview] Import a four-dimensional array and "slice" one dimension to plot in 3D

Thank you for this suggestion. I have been looking at programmable sources, and although they are new to me, I think I have found a few issues for my objective: - I seem unable to import a few python packages that I know I can import in a usual python command. - I can't find a way to have this

Re: [Paraview] issue about deformed and misplaced color bars ...

Ufuk, I believe the issue you're running into is https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/17197, more so than the one your pointed. I have a fix for 17197 on the way: https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/1393 Utkarsh On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:39 AM,

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

Ben/Fabian I just did another quick test and it looks like the PVSB 5.2 build on my OS X 10.9 system that this flag was required to get the build to work: -DCMAKE_OSX_SDK="macosx10.9” and this one was apparently optional and not required:

Re: [Paraview] issue about deformed and misplaced color bars ...

Hi Ufuk, I'm not sure if this fix will make it into the 5.3 release. We'll try but we have a pretty hard deadline for the release. As a workaround, while Trace is not capturing the movement the Python state does. You can use that information to set the desired values in your Catalyst Python

Re: [Paraview] Automating contour isosurface values in parallel Catalyst Python script

Glad to hear! Also, thanks for replying to the list. On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:50 AM, wrote: > > Hi Andy and Joachim, > > I adapted Andy's suggestions, and my script is now both slightly simpler > (no mpi4py or numpy dependencies) and works on both machines. > > PS. I

Re: [Paraview] PVSB 5.2: missing modules and plugins after "make install"

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 13:17:37 +, Michel Rasquin wrote: > Has anybody already tested successfully PVSB 5.2 from the install > directory without loosing plugins and other module down the road? Oh, running from the install directory? That's not really fully supported. The reason is that we

Re: [Paraview] PVSB 5.2: missing modules and plugins after "make install"

Hi Cory and Ben, After your email, I updated my PVSB 5.2 version, recompiled from a clean build directory and reinstalled to a fresh directory. Unfortunately, I can still observe the same behavior as before so the latest changes you mentioned in your email did not fix this issue. If this can

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:43:17 +, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) wrote: > Cmake was complaining about CMAKE_OSX_SDK not being set … > I’m not sure if I needed to set both variables, but I recalled seeing this > in a mail thread, so I just set it! 8-) Ah, then you

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

Cmake was complaining about CMAKE_OSX_SDK not being set … I’m not sure if I needed to set both variables, but I recalled seeing this in a mail thread, so I just set it! 8-) Rick Angelini USArmy Research Laboratory CISD/HPC Architectures Team Phone: 410-278-6266

Re: [Paraview] Automating contour isosurface values in parallel Catalyst Python script

Hi Andy and Joachim, I adapted Andy's suggestions, and my script is now both slightly simpler (no mpi4py or numpy dependencies) and works on both machines. PS. I cc'd the ParaView mailing list, since I started this thread on it, and forgot "reply to all" in one of my own responses... Thanks

[Paraview] issue about deformed and misplaced color bars ...

Hi, I was using Catalyst with 5.2 and the color bars are shown as tiny and also misplaced when it is compared with ParaView output. I also checked it with 5.3RC1 and the issue is still in there. So, is there any plan to fix it in 5.3. There ware also discussion about it in the mail list and it

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 Release Candidate 1 binaries are available for download

Hi, Yes the issue was related with make version. Actually, I was using pretty old one (cmake/3.5.2) and after upgrading it to cmake/3.7.2, the error is gone. Thanks for your help, --ufuk ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source