Hi Bruno,
It sounds like you are running into this issue:
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/17461
We don't yet have a fix in hand, but your report adds another data point.
Thanks,
Cory
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:24 PM, bruno le hyaric
wrote:
> Hi Cory,
>
> I am interested to u
Hi Cory,
I am interested to use Paraview 5.4 on Windows but it seems the render
view is broken. When I try to display something (a sphere for example)
I get a "black render view".
I am running the build without MPI
(ParaView-5.4.0-Qt5-OpenGL2-Windows-64bit.exe) on Windows 7 SP1 64-bit
with Intel
In cooperation with SIGHPC and held in conjunction with SC16: The
International
Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis,
Denver, Colorado, U.S.A.
ISAV 2017 - http://vis.lbl.gov/Events/ISAV-2017/
Full-day 9:00 AM - 5:30 PM Sunday November 12th,
Joel,
Alas, there is nothing built in to ParaView to do this. It's possible that
Computational Model Builder (http://www.computationalmodelbuilder.org/),
which is based on ParaView, better supports your use case, but I'm not
familiar enough with it to say so for sure.
Best regards,
Cory
On Sat,
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:51 AM, Nigro, Francesco <
francesco.ni...@ferrari.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone benchmarked paraview on different filesystems?
>
>
I don't know the answer to that but would be interested in the results.
>
>
> Does a parallel fs, such as Lustre, really boost perf
+1 for dropping 4
Regarding 5.9 what distros/versions is it not yet readily available on? If
nothing major, then +1 as well.
On Jun 8, 2017 2:43 AM, "MicK7" wrote:
+1 for qt 5.9
And thanks for the great job on 5.4 release.
Mickael PHILIT
On 06/06/2017 18:44, Michael Jackson wrote:
> +1.
>
Hi all,
Does anyone benchmarked paraview on different filesystems?
Does a parallel fs, such as Lustre, really boost performance?
Any suggestions about best fs for paraview?
Many thanks,
fn
[Ferrari]
Questo messaggio รจ da intendersi esclusivamente ad uso del
