Hi Berk,
Thanks for this info – good to know that the Mesa issue is due to an inherent
texture size limit, and not some local issue with our config etc.
We’ll make more use of our K40s…. when they are free in the queue!
Thanks again for looking into this.
--
David Trudgian Ph.D.
Computational
Berk,
Thanks very much for looking into this. Look forward to trying things out
whenever they’re ready.
DT
--
David Trudgian Ph.D.
Computational Scientist, BioHPC
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, TX 75390-9039
Tel: (214) 648-4833
From: Berk Geveci [mailto:berk.gev...@kitware.com]
Sent
Trudgian Ph.D.
Computational Scientist, BioHPC
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, TX 75390-9039
Tel: (214) 648-4833
From: Berk Geveci [mailto:berk.gev...@kitware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 2:43 PM
To: David Trudgian <david.trudg...@utsouthwestern.edu>
Cc: ParaView Mailin
Thanks for the info – will try the new release with OSMESA next week. Still
waiting to get an allocation on our Tesla K40 nodes to test the large dataset
with OpenGL2 and hardware rendering.
Thanks again,
--
David Trudgian Ph.D.
Computational Scientist, BioHPC
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Am currently using Mesa 10.5.4 as I’d seen that as a working config mentioned
somewhere on the web, so will try newer. Any reason to avoid the 10.6 series?
I guess I should also try moving to Paraview 4.4 now :-)
--
David Trudgian Ph.D.
Computational Scientist, BioHPC
UT Southwestern Medical
Yes, unsigned short values.
DT
--
David Trudgian Ph.D.
Computational Scientist, BioHPC
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, TX 75390-9039
Tel: (214) 648-4833
From: Berk Geveci [mailto:berk.gev...@kitware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 2:43 PM
To: David Trudgian <david.tr
type
--
David Trudgian Ph.D.
Computational Scientist, BioHPC
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, TX 75390-9039
Tel: (214) 648-4833
-Original Message-
From: David Trudgian
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 12:36 PM
To: Aashish Chaudhary <aashish.chaudh...@kitware.com>
Cc: Berk
construct `float' from a non-numeric data type
0:131(22): error: operands to arithmetic operators must be numeric
0:131(17): error: cannot construct `vec4' from a non-numeric data type
Cheers,
--
David Trudgian Ph.D.
Computational Scientist, BioHPC
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, TX 75390-9039
Tel
siveness is really great - but the 16GB file is a no-go even scaling up
across 16 nodes. The VTI itself seems fine, as slices and surface look as
expected.
Thanks again for any and all suggestions!
DT
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 5:00 PM, David Trudgian <
> david.trudg...@utsouthwestern.edu> wr
DT
From: Aashish Chaudhary [aashish.chaudh...@kitware.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 9:59 AM
To: David Trudgian
Cc: Berk Geveci; ParaView list
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Volume Rendering 17GB 8.5 billion cell volume
Thanks Dave. Haven' t looked at your email in det
pvserver.
Thanks again,
DT
--
David Trudgian Ph.D.
Computational Scientist, BioHPC
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, TX 75390-9039
Tel: (214) 648-4833
From: Utkarsh Ayachit [mailto:utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 4:21 PM
To: David Trudgian <david.tr
Utkarsh,
Thanks – your hunch was correct. Went back through building llvm, osmesa,
libGlu and now have a working setup. Not sure where I went wrong, but it’s all
good now.
DT
--
David Trudgian Ph.D.
Computational Scientist, BioHPC
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, TX 75390-9039
Tel: (214
Hi,
We have been experimenting with using Paraview to display very volumes from very
large TIFF stacks generated by whole-brain microscopy equipment. The test stack
has dimensions of 5,368x10,695x150. Stack is assembled in ImageJ from individual
TIFFs, exported as a RAW and loaded into paraview.
to further
connection attempts.
Has anyone else come across this issue with an OSMesa build? As above, the
build using a physical NVIDIA card works great, with MPI working nicely etc.
Many Thanks,
--
David Trudgian Ph.D.
Computational Scientist, BioHPC
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, TX 75390
Utkarsh,
Thanks for the note. Glad to know that we might not be the only ones with the
issue. I’m working on getting a debug build and callstack now. Just thought I’d
post first in case anyone had any ideas.
--
David Trudgian Ph.D.
Computational Scientist, BioHPC
UT Southwestern Medical Center
ProcessModule::PROCESS_SERVER)
at
/home2/dtrudgian/paraview/ParaView-v4.3.1-source/CommandLineExecutables/pvserver_common.h:91
#48 0x0040337e in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffd5d8)
at
/home2/dtrudgian/paraview/ParaView-v4.3.1-source/CommandLineExecutables/pvserver.cxx:27
--
David Trud
16 matches
Mail list logo