If I understood you correctly, you can't do what you want using the clip
filter to remove the part of the data that is superposing the surface.
regards
Renato.
Karthik Ram Srinivasan wrote:
Hi,
I want to superpose two files, one with a wireframe representation and
the other with a surface
Have you tried to change the byte order? I opened your binary files
without any problem in PV 3.4.0.
Cheers
Renato.
Raashid Baig wrote:
I have written two C subroutines for writing EnSight Gold ASCII and
EnSight Gold Binary files for a simple 2D unstructured grid. I have
followed the proce
n't have a copy of Ensight myself, I've attached the case file that was
outputted from fluent.
I appreciate the help.
Just some more info in case it is relevant I am running paraview 3.4 on a XP
machine.
-Original Message-
From: Renato N. Elias [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Weird, it should work... I've already loaded transient geometries in PV
in the past...
Have you tried to change the byte order (little/big endian)?
Cheers
Renato.
Stephen Gillen wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to use Paraview to postprocess transient results from Fluent. I
am new to paraview an
sa? If it is
Mesa, is it the very latest version? Also, what happens when you try
something simple on 2 processors? Can you get a stack trace?
-berk
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Renato N. Elias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks, I need some tips for rendering a large dataset using offscre
it should only load one iteration, not all at once.
Could you please try to load the geometry only (no scalars) and see
what happens.
Thanks
Jerry
Renato N. Elias wrote:
There's something wrong with memory allocation employed by ParaView
(3.4.0) OR Xdmf library. When I load a tempora
There's something wrong with memory allocation employed by ParaView
(3.4.0) OR Xdmf library. When I load a temporal collection of spatial
collections it seems that ParaView (or Xdmf) is trying to allocate
memory for all time steps at once as it were a multiblock of
multiblocks. My guess is th
How about using a mid term option!? Have you tried the RelWithDebInfo
project?
Renato.
Dominik Szczerba wrote:
Thanks a lot David for the clarifications,
Dominik
David Cole wrote:
If you want to debug things with the Microsoft compiler on Windows,
you have to build *everything* loaded into
Folks, I need some tips for rendering a large dataset using offscreen
rendering in a SGI Altix-ICE.
Basically, I have a 40 million tetrahedra mesh partitioned in 128 cpus.
The result is stored in Xdmf format (15 time steps) and I can
successfully load the datasets in ParaView 3.4.0 and do ba
not, I believe.
-berk
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Renato N. Elias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Forgive me. In fact, it helped. When I said that, I was making reference to
the movie produced by pv.2.6.2 which, in my opinion, is the best in quality.
[]'s
Renato.
Utkarsh Ayachit wro
I can see that pv-3.4.0_offscreen-UNCHECKED.avi is well-lit when
compared with pv-3.4.0_offscreen-CHECKED.avi, or am I missing
something here?
Utkarsh
Renato N. Elias wrote:
Hi Utkarsh,
yes, I'm using a Windows machine and the offscreen rendering option
has not helped so much :-(
Just
d then save the animation. Is this any better?
Utkarsh
Renato N. Elias wrote:
Some time ago I reported the poor quality of the movies that I've
been creating in PV version 3. They seem darkened (I turned on the
lights) and with low resolution (952 x 554 seems to be a good
resolut
Some time ago I reported the poor quality of the movies that I've been
creating in PV version 3. They seem darkened (I turned on the lights)
and with low resolution (952 x 554 seems to be a good resolution). No
one answered me and I concluded that the problem was some
misconfiguration I made.
Folks, does anybody know if it's possible to put ParaView in full screen
mode? Maybe undocking the main screen, I don't know. I already tried by
clicking everywhere without any lucky... It should be easy to implement
since PV supports tiled displays.
Regards
Renato.
__
Cool, now there's a Win64 release!
Berk Geveci wrote:
The ParaView 3.4 release is now available for download from the
ParaView web site (http://paraview.org). It is also available through
CVS; the tag is ParaView-3-4-0. Since the 3.2 release, we have been
focusing on usability and 3.4 contains
John Doe wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for the suggestion. I assume that for double precision I am
doing a base64 encoding for every number in the list? Is compression
worthwhile for floating point data? Are there free compression
libraries out there?
There's a "Kitware System Library" (KWSYS) in
Hi John,
try the auto accept option in menu edit/settings general section.
[]'s
Renato.
John Doe wrote:
Thank you. That fixed the problem. It didn't like my device dimensions.
I am now able to use Delaunay 3d filter and then slice the data.
Is there any way to update the plane of the sl
Hi folks, does anybody know if it's possible to configure the volume
rendering color scale before applying it? It's hard to set the scale
since ParaView tries to automatically render the image every time we
release the mouse button. Maybe an apply button in the color scale
editor would help i
same but make
the name sound like a more positive action like "suppress ordered
compositing"?
-Ken
On 10/8/08 12:33 PM, "Renato N. Elias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Kitware folks,
this morning I was playing with some of the Render View parameters and
found s
Hey Kitware folks,
this morning I was playing with some of the Render View parameters and
found something that could be adjusted:
in "Remote Rendering Parameters" there's a check box saying "disable
ordered compositing". It's quite weird enable a checkbox to disable
something. Since it's a
Hi John, in my case I also tried to clean all files from my build
directory (uncountable times) before changing Qt version, but it has not
worked either (this screen shot was taken from one of my tries
http://www.nacad.ufrj.br/~rnelias/paraview/qt.JPG). The only thing that
I have not tested w
wrote:
Yeah I used to fight with it too. It is far from clean. I do not recall now
the details, but what did the trick for me was to specify QMAKE_EXECUTABLE
(or something) and QT_DESIRED_VERSION (or something)
Dominik
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 05:11:56 pm Renato N. Elias wrote:
Michael and
ast Qt 4.3 to build ParaView.
Mike Jackson
On Oct 7, 2008, at 10:31 AM, Renato N. Elias wrote:
Hi Michael,
there's something overriding my QTDIR because CMake still points to
the wrong Qt version. I've set both QT_QMAKE_EXECUTABLE and QTDIR to
3.3.4 version, but CMake still retu
stand all that CMake
sintaxe in FindQt4.cmake and UseQt4.cmake modules.
weird, isn't it?!
Renato.
Michael Jackson wrote:
On Oct 7, 2008, at 9:26 AM, Renato N. Elias wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm facing a curious problem here. I was using Qt-4.3.4 to compile
ParaView in a Windows machine an
Hi folks,
I'm facing a curious problem here. I was using Qt-4.3.4 to compile
ParaView in a Windows machine and it had been working fine but after
installing a second version of Qt (4.4.2), CMake 2.6 (patch 2 RC-5)
seems to be getting confused about which version it should use. Even
pointing
Here in our lab we have ParaView compiled with offscreen rendering in 3
Altix systems (350, 450 and ICE). The offscreen rendering, in our case,
is not so fast but works fine most of the times (there's some adjusts to
be made as you must have seen in the wiki's page).
Renato.
Robert Mueller
Are your pvservers 32 or 64 bits? If your pvserver's were compiled with
32 bits, my guess is that, you can't load piece of models with more than
4GB.
It's just my guess since I don't know exactly how PV works in these
cases. Note that you can have the whole model in just 1 file or split in
I guess he's asking for a file format suitable to store transient
solutions in unstructured grids and supported by ParaView. If so,
there's a bunch of options (take a look at here
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView:FAQ#What_file_formats_does_ParaView_support.3F).
The simplest choice, IMHO, is En
Hi Raphael, it's Renato.
This linking errors seem that CMake is not finding your ParaView build
dir, or you have a project mismatch. Note that if you're building a
"Release" ParaView you must also build a "Release" plugin project.
Cheers
Renato.
Rafael March wrote:
Hum...
thanks, Mike,
Jerry,
I've been doing some tests with XDMF and it seems that, now, the
"spatial collection of temporal collections" (I will refer this
combination as type 1 for simplicity) is working better than the
"temporal collection of spatial collections" (type 2). I've implemented
both and when I loa
Does anybody know where the source-code for version 3.3.1 is? It's not
on the download page. Can I checkout from CVS using the tag
"ParaView-3-3-1"?
Regards
Renato.
___
ParaView mailing list
ParaView@paraview.org
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/lis
's
Renato.
Renato N. Elias wrote:
(...now I'm pretty sure that the problem is not version mismatch ;o) )
I'm trying to run a client x server reverse connection between an
Altix-ICE(server/offscreen rendering) and a Windows XP laptop.
The scenario is:
-- ParaView 3 CVS's HE
(...now I'm pretty sure that the problem is not version mismatch ;o) )
I'm trying to run a client x server reverse connection between an
Altix-ICE(server/offscreen rendering) and a Windows XP laptop.
The scenario is:
-- ParaView 3 CVS's HEAD (I updated both, client and server, today)
On Wind
I've just found a way using the "Merge blocks" filter before "Clean to
Grid".
Renato.
Renato N. Elias wrote:
Folks,
I'm loading parallel files that do not have ghost information and I'd
like to remove the parallel interface between mesh partitions. In
Cool, quite interesting idea.
Correct if I'm saying something nonsense. Could an offscreen-rendered
image be sent to a "web-paraview-client"? I guess Berk could clarify it...
Renato.
(...I'll surely keep track of this message thread...)
Pete Carswell wrote:
We currently have Paraview 3 runn
Folks,
I'm loading parallel files that do not have ghost information and I'd
like to remove the parallel interface between mesh partitions. In older
versions (2.x), the "clean to grid" filter would be enough to do such
task, but it's not possible in PV3 anymore. I don't know how is the
devel
Here it goes http://www.nacad.ufrj.br/~rnelias/transfer/xdfm-test.zip
nothing special, just some time steps for a cavity flow run.
Renato.
John Biddiscombe wrote:
at 1390 of xdmf reader
// we will not output a TemporalDataset, but use this as a
flag for later
// Jerry Chang
37 matches
Mail list logo