I am trying to make the camera fly around a very large data set. I turned
representation to outline, hoping that would let me setup the animation and
view it quickly (ie without having to wait 10 seconds for it to display each
frame). The idea being that once it looks like it is correctly orbiting
I think that the outline should render very quickly and is probably the best
way of setting the animation. Is it not doing that? It may be a bug then.
-berk
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:15 PM, David Doria wrote:
> I am trying to make the camera fly around a very large data set. I turned
> represent
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Berk Geveci wrote:
> I think that the outline should render very quickly and is probably the
> best
> way of setting the animation. Is it not doing that? It may be a bug then.
>
> -berk
>
>
Can anyone else confirm or deny this? It goes slightly faster than if I
don
I can confirm this behavior. Funky. We'll debug this soon (before the
3.6 release).
-berk
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 9:10 PM, David Doria wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Berk Geveci
> wrote:
>>
>> I think that the outline should render very quickly and is probably the
>> best
>> way of s
The outline render is very quickly, but if you change a filter
parameter during the animation
paraview will still calculate the solution.
Felipe
Le 19 avr. 09 à 01:00, Berk Geveci a écrit :
I think that the outline should render very quickly and is probably
the best
way of setting the anim
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Felipe Bordeu Weldt <
bor...@lmt.ens-cachan.fr> wrote:
> The outline render is very quickly, but if you change a filter parameter
> during the animation
> paraview will still calculate the solution.
>
> Felipe
Hm, I wasn't changing any filter params, just trying
This is definitely a bug/issue. David is not doing anything wrong. We
will investigate it.
-berk
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:16 AM, David Doria wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Felipe Bordeu Weldt
> wrote:
>>
>> The outline render is very quickly, but if you change a filter parameter
>>
David,
This problem seems to have been fixed with CVS ParaView. I can't reproduce
it anymore. Can you please verify that it's fixed for you?
Thanks
Utkarsh
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Berk Geveci wrote:
> This is definitely a bug/issue. David is not doing anything wrong. We
> will investig
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit <
utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote:
> David,
>
> This problem seems to have been fixed with CVS ParaView. I can't reproduce
> it anymore. Can you please verify that it's fixed for you?
>
> Thanks
> Utkarsh
>
Yep, seems to be working now, thanks.