Re: [Paraview] Is Paraview the right program?

2014-03-25 Thread Moreland, Kenneth
I would only use an ASCII-based format if the data are small, but I usually use the VTK legacy format as a quick-and-dirty approach. I find it a bit easier to generate and read than the XML formats. If you get to the point of creating larger or parallel meshes, you probably want to move to a binary

Re: [Paraview] Is Paraview the right program?

2014-03-25 Thread Armin Wehrfritz
Hi, ParaView offers you a lot of visualisation and data handling options, so yes definitely the right choice. :) Concerning the file format: The VTK data-structures are well suited for such kind of data, however I personally find the learning curve of VTK rather steep. Meaning, it might be q

Re: [Paraview] Is Paraview the right program?

2014-03-25 Thread Marco Nawijn
Hello Florian, Yes! Paraview is definitely a good choice. I would also recommend to use VTK for managing some of the FEM related datastructures. In particular, I would recommend to use one or more of the grid/cell classes. This also provides you automatically with different export formats (see for

[Paraview] Is Paraview the right program?

2014-03-24 Thread Florian Schmidt
Hello, I want to write my own FEM program. And now I am looking for a visualization and post-processing tool. What do you think: is paraview a good choice? Is there an ascii-fileformat you would recommend to use as output from the FEM program and as input for paraview? Thanks, Florian ___