David,
That’s perfect.
Eugene
From: David Lonie [mailto:david.lo...@kitware.com]
Sent: 28 June 2016 21:40
To: Eugene de Villiers
Cc: Takuya OSHIMA ; paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Minor bug in OPENFOAM import filter
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:06 PM, David Lonie
mailto:david.lo
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:06 PM, David Lonie
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Eugene de Villiers <
> e.devilli...@engys.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Takuya, David,
>>
>> That would be perfect. What kind of timeline are we looking at to see
>> this in a release version?
>>
>
> It's difficult to sa
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Eugene de Villiers
wrote:
> Hi Takuya, David,
>
> That would be perfect. What kind of timeline are we looking at to see this
> in a release version?
>
It's difficult to say for sure. It might be out in the next patch release,
but it might have to wait for the nex
: [Paraview] Minor bug in OPENFOAM import filter
Hi David and Eugene,
From: David Lonie
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Minor bug in OPENFOAM import filter
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:34:10 -0400
> Alternatively, I saw some discussion around skipping every entry in
> boundaryField specifications othe
Hi David and Eugene,
From: David Lonie
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Minor bug in OPENFOAM import filter
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:34:10 -0400
> Alternatively, I saw some discussion around skipping every entry in
> boundaryField specifications other than 'value'. This would likely
&g
Hi Eugene,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Eugene de Villiers wrote:
> Attached find a small case
>
Thanks -- I've loaded this up and can reproduce the error. The error occurs
in vtkFoamEntryValue::ReadList, which contains the following comment:
// general-purpose list reader - guess the typ
June 2016 15:20
To: Eugene de Villiers
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Minor bug in OPENFOAM import filter
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Eugene de Villiers
mailto:e.devilli...@engys.com>> wrote:
Hi,
We have come across a minor, but annoying bug in the Paraview OPENFOAM
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Eugene de Villiers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We have come across a minor, but annoying bug in the Paraview OPENFOAM
> reader.
>
Hi Eugene,
I'll take a look at this. I'm not terribly familiar with openfoam files, so
if you could send me that small example to reproduce
Hi,
We have come across a minor, but annoying bug in the Paraview OPENFOAM reader.
The component of the Paraview OPENFOAM parser that reads boundary conditions
has been set up to always expect another number where a scalar is encountered
in the following configuration:
(1.111 ###
when you fol