August 17, 2012 4:15 PM
>
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] Numpy masking (via programm filter) not quite
> working in parallel
>
> Hi Sohail,
>
>> ... Will this point sharing information become available in later versions
>> of ParaView? i.e. would it ever be easy to identi
te:
> Very well. I think that should be fine for now.
>
> Sohail
>
>
> From: David Thompson
> To: Sohail Shafii
> Cc: David Thompson ; "paraview@paraview.org"
>
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 4:15 PM
>
> Subject: Re:
Very well. I think that should be fine for now.
Sohail
From: David Thompson
To: Sohail Shafii
Cc: David Thompson ; "paraview@paraview.org"
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Numpy masking (via programm filter) not qui
Hi Sohail,
> ... Will this point sharing information become available in later versions of
> ParaView? i.e. would it ever be easy to identify and count duplicates?
I don't know of any plans to implement this (but that doesn't mean there
aren't).
David
_
aview@paraview.org"
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Numpy masking (via programm filter) not quite working
in parallel
Hi Sohail,
This is likely caused by points shared on several processes. While ParaView
splits the cells of a mesh across processes, cells on th
Hi Sohail,
This is likely caused by points shared on several processes. While ParaView
splits the cells of a mesh across processes, cells on the boundary between
processes share vertices. Thus if a vertex bounds cells split across 3
processes, that vertex will appear in 3 different lists of loc
Hi,
I need to use Numpy in a lot of the programmable filters that I write, and I've
run into differences in how its masking feature works in serial and parallel.
Masking allows one to filter out portions of an array that do not pass some
condition.
As an example, I've created a stock paraview
