Hi John,
Glad you got the bug fixed. As far as I can tell, ParaView has now been
bug-free for 3 years so I knew it must have been with your code :)
I can't say for sure but I would think that you'd want to add in the
vtkGhostLevel array. The trivial producer that's used to inject the data
objec
Andy
Everything is working ok now. I'm glad that you are far away, because you may
want to throw something heavy at me.
I found that my main problem was that I passed an array of real(4) from fortran
to use for the grid spacing and cast them to double* in my adaptor, this caused
some ridiculou
output I can see, but on windows, I see nothing from them. No idea why, but
> it’d help debugging if I knew.
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Andy Bauer [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com]
> *Sent:* 02 January 2012 22:35
>
> *To:* Biddiscombe, John A.
> *Cc:* paraview@paraview.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Pa
vtkRendering.dll!vtkRenderWindowInteractor::Initialize()
>> Line 632 C++
>>
>>
>> vtkRendering.dll!vtkRenderWindowInteractor::ReInitialize() Line 76 + 0x13
>> bytes C++
>>
>>
>> vtkRendering.dll!vtkWin32OpenGLRenderWindow::SetOffScreenRendering(int
st.py". If you get the same results then
> you don't have the fix yet for the image issue. Note that
> parallelpythontest2.png isn't getting colored properly while
> parallelpythontest.png is.
>
> Andy
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Biddiscombe, John
* self,
_object * args) Line 367 + 0x1f bytes C++
I'll look and see if some commits mentioned in earlier emails are missing from
master.
JB
From: Andy Bauer [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com]
Sent: 21 December 2011 21:59
To: Biddiscombe, John A.
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [P
NB. I may not have applied the fix from the other day on the laptop - will
check now
From: Andy Bauer [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com]
Sent: 21 December 2011 21:59
To: Biddiscombe, John A.
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem
I'm attaching a coup
y RTData in the input.
From: Andy Bauer [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com]
Sent: 21 December 2011 21:59
To: Biddiscombe, John A.
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem
I'm attaching a couple of files that you can use to test if you have the proper
fix f
0
> *To:* Biddiscombe, John A.
> *Cc:* paraview@paraview.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem
>
> ** **
>
> Hi John,
>
> There were a couple of issues when saving images. One was for saving
> charts and maybe 2d views. The other one was for
Sent: 21 December 2011 19:10
To: Biddiscombe, John A.
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem
Hi John,
There were a couple of issues when saving images. One was for saving charts
and maybe 2d views. The other one was for when some processes didn'
Hi John,
There were a couple of issues when saving images. One was for saving
charts and maybe 2d views. The other one was for when some processes
didn't have any points or cells. Looking at your stack traces I don't
think it's the latter since that would fail in the python script and give a
wa
I'm getting lock ups when saving images using the coprocessing. It looks a lot
like a bug that was fixed many moons ago, but maybe the fix got lost in a merge
...
1 process makes it to here and waits for MPI traffic
> vtkParallel.dll!vtkMPICommunicatorReduceData(const void *
> sendBuff
Thanks for the fix Andy. I'll test as soon as I can.
Takuya
Takuya OSHIMA, Ph.D.
Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University
8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, JAPAN
From: Andy Bauer
Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple
filters
Date
> +else
>> + {
>> + int len;
>> + controller->Broadcast(&len, 1, 0);
>> + unsigned char *data = new unsigned char[len];
>> + controller->Broadcast(data, len, 0);
>> + vtkClientServerStream stream;
>> + stream.SetData(data, len);
&
Thanks Andy.
Takuya OSHIMA, Ph.D.
Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University
8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, JAPAN
From: Andy Bauer
Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple
filters
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:05:57 -0500
> * Hi Tak
t; + controller->Broadcast(data, len, 0);
> + vtkClientServerStream stream;
> + stream.SetData(data, len);
> + info->CopyFromStream(&stream);
> + delete [] data;
> + }
> +}
> +
> return true;
> }
>
>
> //
>
> Fro
a, len);
+ info->CopyFromStream(&stream);
+ delete [] data;
+ }
+}
+
return true;
}
//------------
From: Andy Bauer
Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple
filters
Date:
t; Takuya OSHIMA, Ph.D.
> Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University
> 8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, JAPAN
>
> From: pat marion
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple
> filters
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:08:54 -0500
&g
81, JAPAN
From: pat marion
Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple
filters
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:08:54 -0500
> That's right, if the output has no point or cell data, then assigning the
> ColorArrayName property will throw an exception. It's
ice.py
>> which also colors by cell p works.
>>
>> Takuya OSHIMA, Ph.D.
>> Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University
>> 8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, JAPAN
>>
>> From: Utkarsh Ayachit
>> Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 copr
> 8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, JAPAN
>
> From: Utkarsh Ayachit
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple
> filters
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:16:18 -0500
>
> > Is the array "p" not present when you'r
From: Utkarsh Ayachit
Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple
filters
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:16:18 -0500
> Is the array "p" not present when you're coprocessnig? Try taking out
> line 323 which sets the array "p" as the array
Is the array "p" not present when you're coprocessnig? Try taking out
line 323 which sets the array "p" as the array to color with.
Utkarsh
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Takuya OSHIMA
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to explore the coprocessing capability of PV 3.12.0. When
> I create a pipeline
23 matches
Mail list logo
