Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple filters

2011-11-11 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit
Is the array "p" not present when you're coprocessnig? Try taking out line 323 which sets the array "p" as the array to color with. Utkarsh On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Takuya OSHIMA wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to explore the coprocessing capability of PV 3.12.0. When > I create a pipeline

Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple filters

2011-11-11 Thread Takuya OSHIMA
From: Utkarsh Ayachit Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple filters Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:16:18 -0500 > Is the array "p" not present when you're coprocessnig? Try taking out > line 323 which sets the array "p" as the array

Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple filters

2011-11-11 Thread Andy Bauer
> 8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, JAPAN > > From: Utkarsh Ayachit > Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple > filters > Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:16:18 -0500 > > > Is the array "p" not present when you'r

Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple filters

2011-11-11 Thread pat marion
ice.py >> which also colors by cell p works. >> >> Takuya OSHIMA, Ph.D. >> Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University >> 8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, JAPAN >> >> From: Utkarsh Ayachit >> Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 copr

Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple filters

2011-11-12 Thread Takuya OSHIMA
81, JAPAN From: pat marion Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple filters Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:08:54 -0500 > That's right, if the output has no point or cell data, then assigning the > ColorArrayName property will throw an exception. It's

Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple filters

2011-11-13 Thread Andy Bauer
t; Takuya OSHIMA, Ph.D. > Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University > 8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, JAPAN > > From: pat marion > Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple > filters > Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:08:54 -0500 &g

Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple filters

2011-11-14 Thread Takuya OSHIMA
a, len); + info->CopyFromStream(&stream); + delete [] data; + } +} + return true; } //------------ From: Andy Bauer Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple filters Date:

Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple filters

2011-12-06 Thread Andy Bauer
t; + controller->Broadcast(data, len, 0); > + vtkClientServerStream stream; > + stream.SetData(data, len); > + info->CopyFromStream(&stream); > + delete [] data; > + } > +} > + > return true; > } > > > // > > Fro

Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple filters

2011-12-07 Thread Takuya OSHIMA
Thanks Andy. Takuya OSHIMA, Ph.D. Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University 8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, JAPAN From: Andy Bauer Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple filters Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:05:57 -0500 > * Hi Tak

Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple filters

2011-12-20 Thread Andy Bauer
> +else >> + { >> + int len; >> + controller->Broadcast(&len, 1, 0); >> + unsigned char *data = new unsigned char[len]; >> + controller->Broadcast(data, len, 0); >> + vtkClientServerStream stream; >> + stream.SetData(data, len); &

Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple filters

2011-12-20 Thread Takuya OSHIMA
Thanks for the fix Andy. I'll test as soon as I can. Takuya Takuya OSHIMA, Ph.D. Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University 8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, JAPAN From: Andy Bauer Subject: Re: [Paraview] PV 3.12.0 coprocessing problem when using multiple filters Date