I am simply applying a (Python) Programmable Filter after loading in the
data so the data itself does not get touched or modified before the
Programmable Filter is applied. Rebuilding paraview from git won't be a
problem since I've branched a few git versions in the past. If possible,
any workaroun
Also remember this gem, which may help you.
>Note also that there is a "feature" in the python programmable filter
>that comes into play with structured data. That feature says that
>structured data is not split at all by default. If you want structured
>data to actually be parallel you need to pu
One more question. What are you doing after reading the data? Depending on
what you are doing, I might be able to give you a piece of code that uses
George's filter to generate ghost levels using MPI. You will need to use
ParaView built from git.
Next week, George and I will start working on updat
Yes, appended raw mode. It has an ascii header then the data itself is
binary after a specified underscore delimiter.
Jesus
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Berk Geveci wrote:
> Actually, I think that I noticed this too. It may be a bug specific to the
> programmable filter. I will check it out.
Actually, I think that I noticed this too. It may be a bug specific to the
programmable filter. I will check it out. By the way, what do you mean by
"raw" vti? Appended raw mode?
-berk
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Jesus Pulido wrote:
> Thank you Berk.
>
> I was under the impression that th
There is also ghost cell generator for image data that does not convert
to multi block. It's called SQImageGhosts and resides in the
SciberQuestToolKit pluign.
You would need to ensure the plugin is loaded and insert this filter
upstream of your python filter.
In your filter's RequestUpdateE
Since you have structured grids, one other possibility is using:
vtkPUniformGridGhostDataGenerator
(http://www.vtk.org/doc/nightly/html/classvtkPUniformGridGhostDataGenerator.html)
Each process constructs a vtkMultiBlockDataSet instance consisting of
the grids/blocks owned by the process with NULL
Thank you Berk.
I was under the impression that this command would trigger the reader to
automatically load in the additional # of requested ghost levels. I tested
the command and each data piece still has the same extents as before.
Is there any additional way to load in ghost level that's paral
self.GetExecutive().GetOutputInformation(0).Set(vtk.vtkStreamingDemandDrivenPipeline.UPDATE_NUMBER_OF_GHOST_LEVELS(),
1)
in RequestUpdateExtent script. Of course, this requires that the reader or
a filter before the programmable filter is able to provide ghost levels.
-berk
On Wed, Jul 11, 201
Hello,
I am trying to request ghost data in my python programmable filter but I am
not sure how to go about and do so. I am assuming the call would go into
the RequestUpdateExtent Script.
In the C++ equivalent filters that do request ghost data, the call to is
something along the lines of
vtkStre
10 matches
Mail list logo