[Paraview] Warning about Version while Reading File

2016-02-04 Thread Fastl, Thomas
Hello Community, I just installed ParaView 5.0.0 and loaded a vtk-file which worked under ParaView 4.2.0! Doing so I receive the warning 'Reading file version: 4.2 with older reader version 4.0', suggesting that an outdated vtk version is used to read the file. I should mention that changing t

Re: [Paraview] Warning about Version while Reading File

2016-02-04 Thread Cory Quammen
Thomas, I'm surprised your file didn't cause a complaint in ParaView 4.2. The legacy VTK file reader in VTK hasn't changed in quite some years. What software writes your VTK file? If it were written with VTK (perhaps by way of ParaView), the file version number should be 4.2. By the way, this sho

Re: [Paraview] Warning about Version while Reading File

2016-02-04 Thread Berk Geveci
Actually, we changed how the ghost levels are handled and had to update the format accordingly. It may be related to that. Dan would know more. Best, -berk On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Cory Quammen wrote: > Thomas, > > I'm surprised your file didn't cause a complaint in ParaView 4.2. The >

Re: [Paraview] Warning about Version while Reading File

2016-02-04 Thread Dan Lipsa
Hi Thomas, I am surprised that version 4.2 gets in the file. In our last upgrade to the file format we increased the version from 3.0 to 4.0. So format 4.2 is not out yet. I wonder if Paraview writes that. How did you generate the file? Thanks, Dan On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Berk Geveci

Re: [Paraview] Warning about Version while Reading File

2016-02-04 Thread Fastl, Thomas
[Paraview] Warning about Version while Reading File Hi Thomas, I am surprised that version 4.2 gets in the file. In our last upgrade to the file format we increased the version from 3.0 to 4.0. So format 4.2 is not out yet. I wonder if Paraview writes that. How did you generate the file? Thanks, Da

Re: [Paraview] Warning about Version while Reading File

2016-02-04 Thread Dan Lipsa
ParaView 5.0.0. Problem solved and sorry again, that was > unnecessary! > > > Best, Thomas > > -- > *From:* Dan Lipsa > *Sent:* Thursday, February 4, 2016 4:43 PM > *To:* Berk Geveci > *Cc:* Cory Quammen; Fastl, Thomas; paraview@para