[Paraview] Xdmf on master branch

2011-07-29 Thread Tim Gallagher
Hi, I just built off the master branch (commit 4f0d9672) and I noticed XDMF_WRAP_PYTHON was no longer an option. It appears it was set to INTERNAL in commit 7ac1f751, which was due to the conversation in the mailing list (http://markmail.org/message/gapnf4reuazdtfcn), although I'm not sure if

Re: [Paraview] Xdmf on master branch

2011-08-01 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit
I think making the option advanced makes sense. Dave, any objections? Utkarsh On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Tim Gallagher wrote: > Hi, > > I just built off the master branch (commit 4f0d9672) and I noticed > XDMF_WRAP_PYTHON was no longer an option. > > It appears it was set to INTERNAL in c

Re: [Paraview] Xdmf on master branch

2011-08-01 Thread David Partyka
That should work. Ideally we can get packaging XDMF's python module working properly for the next major release. I just created a bug for that task here: http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=12445 On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit < utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote: > I think mak

Re: [Paraview] Xdmf on master branch

2011-08-01 Thread Tim Gallagher
ot;Utkarsh Ayachit" Cc: gtg0...@mail.gatech.edu, "ParaView list" Sent: Monday, August 1, 2011 12:05:15 PM Subject: Re: [Paraview] Xdmf on master branch That should work. Ideally we can get packaging XDMF's python module working properly for the next major release. I just create