> ==18020==still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
> ==18020== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
>
> Regards,
> Takuya
>
> Takuya OSHIMA, Ph.D.
> Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University
> 8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Ni
ll reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
> ==18020== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
>
> Regards,
> Takuya
>
> Takuya OSHIMA, Ph.D.
> Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University
> 8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, JAPAN
>
>
> From: "Morelan
d: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
Regards,
Takuya
Takuya OSHIMA, Ph.D.
Faculty of Engineering, Niigata University
8050 Ikarashi-Ninocho, Nishi-ku, Niigata, 950-2181, JAPAN
From: "Moreland, Kenneth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [Paraview] a leak from vtkCommunicator::Broadcast(vtkDataArr
Hi,
I got a leak from vtkCommunicator::Broadcast(vtkDataArray *, int)
detected by the "leaks" tool on OS X. It looks like it's because the
delete operator at line 1004 of vtkCommunicator.cxx is enclosed by "if
(nameLength > 0)," while the new operator at line 984 is not (the leak
disappears if I s
