Re: [Paraview] couple of issues related with co-processing ...

2016-04-16 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi, You can download the Catalyst script from following link, https://www.dropbox.com/s/eajs9dm0of5b4bi/script_data.tar.gz?dl=0 I also included the data and ParaView state that is used to create the Catalyst script. So, it might help to find the problem. Thanks, --ufuk > I haven't seen

Re: [Paraview] couple of issues related with co-processing ...

2016-04-15 Thread Andy Bauer
I haven't seen issues like that. Can you share the Catalyst script that fails? On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE) < u.utku.turunco...@be.itu.edu.tr> wrote: > Hi Andy, > > As you suggested in your previous mail, i used allinputsgridwriter.py > script to write all the

Re: [Paraview] couple of issues related with co-processing ...

2016-04-15 Thread Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)
Hi Andy, As you suggested in your previous mail, i used allinputsgridwriter.py script to write all the available fields as multiblock dataset and i created co-processing scripts using this dataset. Now, i could handle multiple 3d fields but i have still problem in the combination of contour

Re: [Paraview] couple of issues related with co-processing ...

2016-04-14 Thread Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)
Thanks. I'll look at those scripts to generate similar data to the co-processing. By the way, i had a problem in the calculator filter and it was not working in co-processing but again it might be related with the data representation. I'll try it again when i create the multiblock dataset.

Re: [Paraview] couple of issues related with co-processing ...

2016-04-13 Thread Andy Bauer
Hi Ufuk, I would suggest testing out some of the Catalyst examples which are in the source code under the Examples/Catalyst subdirectory. I would also suggest creating Catalyst scripts from data sets generated through Catalyst output instead of the NetCDF files. There are two example scripts for