[Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-26 Thread pratik
I compiled PV on my laptop using gcc but on cluster using icc. When i try to use the TensorglyphFilter plugin, the following error shows: Load Error, Mismatch in version: Paraview Signature: paraviewplugin|GNU|3.10 Plugin signature: paraviewplugin|Intel|3.10 I also tried compiling both plugins u

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-27 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit
You need plugins compiled with both compilers and load the icc plugin on server while load the gcc plugin on client. You cannot interchange them or load the same one on both sides. Utkarsh Sent from my iPad On Apr 27, 2011, at 12:03 AM, pratik wrote: > I compiled PV on my laptop using gcc

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-27 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit
Yes and then load the right plugin on the right process from the "Manage PLugins" dialog. From the error, it looks like you are trying to load the icc built plugin on the gcc built client. Utkarsh On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:59 AM, pratik wrote: > Hi Utkarsh, > I compiled the plugin on BOTH serve

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-28 Thread pratik
I did just as you told and the two pluigns loaded properly however...the plugin is yet not working correctly; the tensors are appearing fractured...What may be the source of error now? pratik On Wednesday 27 April 2011 05:54 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote: Yes and then load the right plugin on the

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-28 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit
Can you post a image? Utkarsh On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:08 AM, pratik wrote: > I did just as you told and the two pluigns loaded properly > however...the plugin is yet not working correctly; the tensors are appearing > fractured...What may be the source of error now? > > pratik > On Wednesday 27

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-28 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit
Not sure, I was able to play with this plugin just fine. Try this: Go to "Edit | Settings" dialog. Open up the "Render View" pages and go to the "Server" Page. There, uncheck the remote-render threshold. Are things still broken? Utkarsh On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:21 AM, pratik wrote: > sure...he

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-28 Thread pratik
Yes...it is still broken :( ;( have you ever had the situation when paraview at both the ends were compiled with different compilers? Is it an X- related problem? pratik On Thursday 28 April 2011 06:01 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote: Not sure, I was able to play with this plugin just fine. Try this

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-28 Thread pratik
iran mpirun with the verbose option on the server and got this as output; MPI: libxmpi.so 'SGI MPT 1.23 03/28/09 11:45:59' MPI: libmpi.so 'SGI MPT 1.23 03/28/09 11:43:39' MPI Environmental Settings MPI: MPI_DSM_DISTRIBUTE (default: not set) : 1 MPI: The default size of the mapped stack area

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-28 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit
Ok first things first. This is community contributed plugin so I have no idea what it does or what it doesn't. To identify the issue, I always tend to start simple. Run without connecting to the server at all. In builtin mode, does the plugin work? Next try with 1 pvserver processes without MPI. Ne

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-28 Thread pratik
Great Idea. Also, thanks very much for helping me Utkarsh. analysis: 1) works on client perfectly 2) started pvserver on head node with -np 1 (for mpi):- no problem 3) works on head node UPTO -np 3 -np 4 becomes fractured. Now, the other filters that i have used have worked perfectlythi

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-28 Thread Sven Buijssen
Hi, Being the one who uploaded the plugin (having added a mere frosting to the servermanager XML that got posted here in 2009) I'd like to add the following: The plugin is merely a convenient way to use vtkTensorGlyph.cxx from within ParaView, but does not add additional features. As such it does

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-28 Thread pratik
Thanks Sven! I'll try that out and post the results. Btw. that would be a nice thing to add to the wiki, if it isn't there already :) pratik On Thursday 28 April 2011 10:17 PM, Sven Buijssen wrote: Hi, Being the one who uploaded the plugin (having added a mere frosting to the servermanager XM

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-28 Thread pratik
Just tried it...but getting same result :( . First loaded data, then applied D3 filter and then applied tensor glyph. am i doing something wrong here? pratik On Thursday 28 April 2011 10:20 PM, pratik wrote: Thanks Sven! I'll try that out and post the results. Btw. that would be a nice thi

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-28 Thread pratik
But hey here's something. i check use minimal memory and it WORKED! i wonder how that happened? anyway, i'm glad that it worked :) Thanks Sven and Utkarsh for all the help ! pratik On Thursday 28 April 2011 10:27 PM, pratik wrote: Just tried it...but getting same result :( . First loaded dat

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-28 Thread pratik
I spoke too soon...the mpi log shows that some processes are yet being starved of data: MPI: libxmpi.so 'SGI MPT 1.23 03/28/09 11:45:59' MPI: libmpi.so 'SGI MPT 1.23 03/28/09 11:43:39' MPI Environmental Settings MPI: MPI_DSM_DISTRIBUTE (default: not set) : 1 MPI: The default size of the ma

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-28 Thread pratik
Also, it turns out that for the larger dataset that I am visualizing (256X256 grid of tensors) even the previous technique does not give unbroken glyphs... On Thursday 28 April 2011 10:35 PM, pratik wrote: I spoke too soon...the mpi log shows that some processes are yet being starved of data:

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-28 Thread pratik
ok. So it does seem like data is being distributed properly by the D3 filter, because on fresh runs, none of the processes spawned are starving of memoryhowever, the glyphs that i get for large datasets are still brokennow i really don't know why...perhaps the data is not being reassemb

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-28 Thread pratik
I also had a small doubt... when i initial read in my data, i can see the plane, and that is coloured by a scalar. When i zoom in and out, i can clearly see the plane "divided" into 8 equal parts, before it renders completely in 1 sec. I am assuming that this is the way in which pv breaks data

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-04-29 Thread pratik
I was just reading the "paraview tutorial". In the place where they demonstrate the D3 filter, it seems that it is the missing ghost cells that result in the fractured visualization. Could this be the cause for the fractured glyphs? If it is then why isn't D3 able to solve the problem here? p

Re: [Paraview] plugin mismatch?

2011-05-02 Thread Moreland, Kenneth
I have not been following this mail thread, but it is possible that the filter you are using is not requesting the appropriate layer of ghost cells in its RequestInformation. If ghost cells are not requested, D3 will not create them. -Ken Kenneth Moreland *** Sandia Nationa