Cool. Thanks for the info. I'll merge this in cleanly once I catch up
with some of my todo list :).
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Insley, Joseph A. wrote:
> For us, having the patch available was really important. Now that we have it
> and can patch our production install, I'd say having it in
-
From: ParaView [mailto:paraview-boun...@paraview.org] On Behalf Of Utkarsh
Ayachit
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 11:11 PM
To: Insley, Joseph A.
Cc: Léo Pessanha; ParaView list
Subject: Re: [Paraview] pv5.0 multi-page tiff in parallel
Thanks, Joe. How critical is it for this change to be in
For us, having the patch available was really important. Now that we have it
and can patch our production install, I'd say having it included in 5.0.1 is
less critical.
Thanks
joe
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 8, 2016, at 10:10 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Joe. How critical is it
Thanks, Joe. How critical is it for this change to be in 5.0.1? I'd
like to add a test for the MR before merging it, but not sure I can
get that in soon.
Utkarsh
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Insley, Joseph A. wrote:
> Utkarsh,
>
> I have now tested a 5.0.0 install with the tiff patch applie
Utkarsh,
I have now tested a 5.0.0 install with the tiff patch applied (thanks Dave),
and the multi-page tiff reader appears to be working as expected, both serial
and in parallel.
Thanks
joe
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 7:37 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
> wrote:
>
>> Do I have to download a different versi
> Do I have to download a different version to have the fix you made?
This change is not merged into the repository yet and hence not
available in 5.0.1 patch release as well. I was hoping someone would
get a change to review/test it before merging it.
Utkarsh
t;
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:36:41 -0500
> From: Utkarsh Ayachit
> To: "Insley, Joseph A."
> Cc: "paraview@paraview.org List"
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] pv5.0 multi
Joe,
It was indeed a bug.
Here's a fix: https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/merge_requests/1228
Would be great if you get a chance to test it.
Utkarsh
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Insley, Joseph A. wrote:
> Utkarsh,
>
> Thanks for looking at this. I am checking with my user regarding a dat
Utkarsh,
Thanks for looking at this. I am checking with my user regarding a dataset
that can be shared. I will get back to you as soon as I hear from them, likely
off list.
Thanks
joe
> On Feb 11, 2016, at 1:28 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
> wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
> Do you have a sample dataset to sha
Joe,
Do you have a sample dataset to share? It's possible there's a bug in
the multipage seek code when dealing with sub extents.
Utkarsh
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Insley, Joseph A. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve been looking at loading tiffs as volumes using pv5.0 and am running
> into trouble d
Hi,
I’ve been looking at loading tiffs as volumes using pv5.0 and am running into
trouble doing this in parallel.
Loading a stack of tiff files as a volume works great, both serially and in
parallel. And I can load a multi-page tiff as a volume using a single pvserver
just fine. But when I r
11 matches
Mail list logo
