Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-23 Thread Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
uot; Date: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 at 9:04 AM To: Rick Angelini Cc: Cory Quammen , ParaView Subject: Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change? On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 13:10:04 +, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) wrote: > Cory - so I did a “git p

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-22 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 13:10:04 +, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) wrote: > Cory - so I did a “git pull” and “git submodule update” in my existing > paraview-superbuild repository directory and that 5.3.0-RC1 information > was not in the versions.cmake file. I did a

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-22 Thread Cory Quammen
From: Cory Quammen > Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 1:36 PM > To: Rick Angelini > Cc: "ben.boec...@kitware.com" , ParaView > > Subject: Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change? > > Rick, > > What is the SHA-1 for last commit in your paraview-superb

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-22 Thread Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-Original Message- From: Cory Quammen Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 1:36 PM To: Rick Angelini Cc: "ben.boec...@kitware.com" , ParaView Subject: Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change? Rick, What is the SHA-1 for last commit in your paraview-superbuild dire

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-21 Thread Cory Quammen
_ > Rick Angelini > USArmy Research Laboratory > CISD/HPC Architectures Team > Phone: 410-278-6266 > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Cory Quammen > Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 10:07 AM > To: Rick Angelini > Cc: "ben.boec...@kitware.com&

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-21 Thread Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
ry 21, 2017 at 10:07 AM To: Rick Angelini Cc: "ben.boec...@kitware.com" , ParaView Subject: Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change? All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-21 Thread Cory Quammen
Hi Rick, From paraview-superbuild master (remember to run 'git submodule update' after updating master), you should be able to set paraview_SOURCE_SELECTION to 5.3.0-RC1. Then just configure and build. These directions are distilled from the README.md file in the superbuild directory [1]. Relevan

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-21 Thread Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
What are the instructions for using PVSB to build the 5.3- RC ? Rick Angelini USArmy Research Laboratory CISD/HPC Architectures Team Phone: 410-278-6266 -Original Message- From: Ben Boeckel Reply-To: "ben.boec...@kitware.com" Date: Wednesday, February

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-17 Thread Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
...@kitware.com" Date: Friday, February 17, 2017 at 7:57 AM To: Rick Angelini Cc: Fabian Wein , ParaView Subject: Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change? On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:43:17 +, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) wrote: > Cmak

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-17 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:43:17 +, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) wrote: > Cmake was complaining about CMAKE_OSX_SDK not being set … > I’m not sure if I needed to set both variables, but I recalled seeing this > in a mail thread, so I just set it! 8-) Ah, then you ju

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-17 Thread Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
-Original Message- From: Ben Boeckel Reply-To: "ben.boec...@kitware.com" Date: Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 4:00 PM To: Rick Angelini Cc: Fabian Wein , ParaView Subject: Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change? On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 16:53:55 +

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-16 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 16:53:55 +, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) wrote: > Fabian - thank you - that was enough of a hint to get me over the hump. > Switched my build to qt5 AND based on some information from a previous > email thread, I added the following to my CMAKE

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-16 Thread Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
Fabian - thank you - that was enough of a hint to get me over the hump. Switched my build to qt5 AND based on some information from a previous email thread, I added the following to my CMAKE command: -DCMAKE_OSX_SDK="macosx10.9" \ -DCMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT="/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Pla

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-15 Thread Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
Duh. “git submodule update” seems to fix things related to the qt and scipy issue. My Mac has Xcode version 6.2 Rick Angelini USArmy Research Laboratory CISD/HPC Architectures Team Phone: 410-278-6266 -Original Message- From: Ben Boeckel Reply-To: "