On Sun Jul 19 12:07:24 2009, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
>
> It appears that this ticket effectively stalled two years ago for lack
> of testers on 64-bit platforms. However I believe that recently we have
> had a big increase in the amount of testing going on on AMD64 and even
> Win64. The fact th
allison, cotto:
Can we get an update on this RT? Does it have any impact on our Parrot
Design Documents or roadmap?
Thank you very much.
kid51
___
http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
On Sun Apr 20 08:58:20 2008, cognominal wrote:
> When testing, got that error message.
> Probably linked to icu and the version used.
> I have 3.4.1 and 3.8.1 around.. I am not sure I currently use the later.
>
Can you provide an update on this problem? Please include OS, platform,
etc. Thanks.
s1n,
Would it be possible for you to provide an update on this problem?
Thank you very much.
kid51
___
http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
On Fri Aug 07 11:20:43 2009, allison wrote:
> The call to 'mmd_distance' was not removed in the refactor, so broke the
> final refactor out into a separate ticket (TT #907).
>
>
allison,
Am I correct in inferring from your comment that *this* RT is closable?
Thanks,
kid51
On Tue Jul 21 19:12:34 2009, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
> On Wed Feb 04 19:33:01 2009, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
> > On Sat Dec 20 18:38:53 2008, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
> > > c. has marked this test as TODO, citing this RT. So investigation
> > > continues while the test file as a whose now PASSes.
On Wed Feb 25 16:08:29 2009, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
> On Thu Jan 29 06:15:28 2009, Whiteknight wrote:
> >
> > has the remove_pic branch landed yet?
>
>
> Well, it's still an active branch in SVN. So I would guess not.
Per discussion on the mailing list, we're removing the remove_pic branch
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Sure thing, if you are going to rip out PIC too, you are exactly at that. It's
> the combination of CGP, PIC, and JIT, which very well did (and maybe still
> does) the runtime optimizations you are looking for.
Thanks for the update Leo! Y
[ this reply is re $subject, not re $author in person]
Am Montag, 14. September 2009 19:09 schrieb Andrew Whitworth:
> It's a fundamental problem with the design that's the killer.
> Parrot JIT does essentially NOTHING to improve execution performance,
> other then streamlining op dispatch.
Sure
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:15:10PM -0400, Nathan Gray wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:15:05PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> > You can find my current draft at http://files.me.com/tim.bunce/65oikg
> > (2.3MB PDF)
>
> page 73 - Haskell should be spelled with two Ls
Thank you! I kept wondering if t
Hello
Thanks to some NCI fixes the MySql.pir module in examples works again in 1.6.0
Unfortunately I lacked the time to check mysqltest.p6 with rakudo
before the release.
Today I tested it, and discovered that rakudo needs to call 'elements'
for some usages, and some MySql objects had 'get_integ
On behalf of the Parrot team, I'm proud to announce Parrot 1.6.0
"half-pie." Parrot (http://parrot.org/) is a virtual machine aimed
at running all dynamic languages.
Parrot 1.6.0 is available on Parrot's FTP site, or follow the
download instructions at http://parrot.org/download. For those who
wo
12 matches
Mail list logo
