Re: [svn:parrot] r46564 - trunk/src/string/charset

2010-05-12 Thread Christoph Otto
On 05/12/2010 06:30 PM, notfo...@parrot.org wrote: Author: NotFound Date: Thu May 13 01:30:49 2010 New Revision: 46564 URL: https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/changeset/46564 Log: simplify mixed_cs_index Modified: trunk/src/string/charset/ascii.c Modified: trunk/src/string/charset/ascii.c

Re: What is the reason for having 'nqp-rx' twice?

2010-05-12 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 07:20:40PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote: > Gerd Pokorra wrote: > > Why lives 'nqp-rx' at ext/nqp-rx in the parrot sources and on github at > > http://github.com/perl6/nqp-rx? > > If I remember correctly, the reasons for NQP-rx being developed outside > of parrot core were (in n

Re: Toward a Better Discussion of Parrot's Future VCS Options

2010-05-12 Thread Allison Randal
On 05/05/10 15:51, Andy Dougherty wrote: and looking at the list of tickets, one of the ones listed as a "blocker" is http://trac-hacks.org/ticket/6398 "Internal error if ticket text references SVN-like revision number (changeset)". It seems to me that this might be a significant issue for parr

Re: What is the reason for having 'nqp-rx' twice?

2010-05-12 Thread jerry gay
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:20, Moritz Lenz wrote: > Gerd Pokorra wrote: >> Why lives 'nqp-rx' at ext/nqp-rx in the parrot sources and on github at >> http://github.com/perl6/nqp-rx? > > It's pretty obvious, but I'll say it anyway: in ex/nqp-rx in the parrot > repository there is only a compiled ve

Re: What is the reason for having 'nqp-rx' twice?

2010-05-12 Thread Will Coleda
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Moritz Lenz wrote: > Gerd Pokorra wrote: >> Why lives 'nqp-rx' at ext/nqp-rx in the parrot sources and on github at >> http://github.com/perl6/nqp-rx? > > It's pretty obvious, but I'll say it anyway: in ex/nqp-rx in the parrot > repository there is only a compiled

Re: What is the reason for having 'nqp-rx' twice?

2010-05-12 Thread Moritz Lenz
Gerd Pokorra wrote: > Why lives 'nqp-rx' at ext/nqp-rx in the parrot sources and on github at > http://github.com/perl6/nqp-rx? It's pretty obvious, but I'll say it anyway: in ex/nqp-rx in the parrot repository there is only a compiled version of nqp-rx. Which is needed for building HLLs. If I re

Re: What is the reason for having 'nqp-rx' twice?

2010-05-12 Thread Austin Hastings
It's a result of a vision/capability mismatch within Parrot. The vision is that parrot is a stable, mature product that is ready to release, and all changes are small, incremental enhancements. Thus, there's this deprecation policy that hangs like a boat anchor on various bits, and requires th

What is the reason for having 'nqp-rx' twice?

2010-05-12 Thread Gerd Pokorra
Why lives 'nqp-rx' at ext/nqp-rx in the parrot sources and on github at http://github.com/perl6/nqp-rx? It looks like a main PCT so I think it should only be placed and maintained in the parrot sources. -- Gerd ___ http://lists.parrot.o

Re: branches/codestring

2010-05-12 Thread Will Coleda
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Stefan O'Rear wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:18:40PM -0400, Will Coleda wrote: >> bacek is a magician, with the latest on branches/codestring >> >> real    3m16.927s >> user    2m59.499s >> sys     0m7.863s >> >> and trunk >> >> real    4m41.854s >> user    3

Re: Embedding parrot as a code generator

2010-05-12 Thread Andrew Whitworth
The newest NQP variants have complete support for all Parrot opcodes natively, so anything you can do in PIR you can do with NQP as well (plus some nicer syntax). You do lose a certain amount of performance currently because of various Parrot issues that NQP successfully works around, but those per