On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Christoph Otto wrote:
> The ops_pct branch is ready to merge into trunk. If you're not familiar
> with the goal of this branch, it's part of chromatic's overall plan for
> Lorito*. We need a proper ops compiler (not a regex-based code mangler)
> before we can use
Will Coleda wrote:
Yes. Perlcritic should only be run on Perl 5 code, not NQP or Perl 6
code; These should be excluded (probably in Parrot::Dist*) when
finding "perl" files to process for testing.
Somehow this got fixed. I suspect some mikehh+ magic!
___
2010/5/14 Jonathan Leto
> Howdy,
>
> > I did a mistake when I reused for a fakexecutable the name 'tapir'
> > from a project which seems abandonned since 3 months
> > (in http://github.com/leto/tapir, last commit on January 26, 2010)
>
> Tapir is not abandoned. You even have a commit bit for it (
Howdy,
> I did a mistake when I reused for a fakexecutable the name 'tapir'
> from a project which seems abandonned since 3 months
> (in http://github.com/leto/tapir, last commit on January 26, 2010)
Tapir is not abandoned. You even have a commit bit for it (as well as
just about every Parrot cor
On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 11:33 +0200, François Perrad wrote:
> I did a mistake when I reused for a fakexecutable the name 'tapir'
> from a project which seems abandonned since 3 months
> (in http://github.com/leto/tapir, last commit on January 26, 2010)
"Stable" != "abandoned". Besides, dukeleto be
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:04 PM, James E Keenan wrote:
> Christoph Otto wrote:
>>
>> The ops_pct branch is ready to merge into trunk.
>
>
> Thanks for a tremendous amount of work on this project.
>
> But before we plan on world domination, we should figure out how to respond
> to criticism ;-) .
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Will Coleda wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
>> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:18:40PM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
>>> bacek is a magician, with the latest on branches/codestring
>>>
>>> real 3m16.927s
>>> user 2m59.499s
>>> sys
On 14/05/10 11:33, François Perrad wrote:
Somebody who really read my code, can not speak of fork or copy+tweaked
like I read in the referenced IRC log.
As I already wrote in
http://lists.parrot.org/pipermail/parrot-dev/2010-April/004110.html
if needed the current fakexecutable 'tapir' in Parrot
On 13/05/10 20:26, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
As a matter of copyright management we can't just import code from other
projects without a copyright notice (and probably a link to the original
project). As a matter of supportability it's important to keep in touch
with the upstream project regard
2010/5/13 Jonathan Leto
> Howdy,
>
> I would like to say that I share japhb++'s slight concerns in copying
> in code without original copyright notices. I wanted Tapir to live in
> ext/ in the same way as pmichaud++'s NQP. I think fperrad added some
> features and renamed various files, so it is
10 matches
Mail list logo
