It is dead code, the remainder of the old JIT's frame-builder. It
should be eliminated. I will eventually if nobody beats me to it.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Andy Lester wrote:
> I'm about to go headerize src/frame_builder.[ch], but then I can't find where
> it's used anywhere. Is it? I
I'm about to go headerize src/frame_builder.[ch], but then I can't find where
it's used anywhere. Is it? I'm able to run a full build and run "make test"
without it.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => a...@petdance.com => www.theworkinggeek.com => AIM:petdance
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 09:40:32PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> On Saturday 14 August 2010 at 16:38, Patrick R wrote:
>
> > If/when the opcode is added, I'll gladly fix up NQP and the regex engine
> > to take advantage of it. Ideally I'd like something like:
> >
> > $I0 = substreq $S0, $S1, $I1
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:26:14AM +1000, Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Will Coleda wrote:
> > Is there a corresponding feature in nqp-rx? I'm trying to port over
> > some old partcl code to use nqp and would like to avoid dragging in
> > PGE if possible.
>
> 1. pir::
