Re: [Announce] GSoC 2011 Announced

2011-02-07 Thread Andrew Whitworth
/me raises hand I definitely want to help out as much as I can this year. Just tell me what to do. --Andrew Whitworth On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Jonathan Leto wrote: > Howdy, > > Who wants to help with GSoC 2011 ? > > Duke > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Carol Smit

Re: Calling a PIR method continuesly from C++ side.

2011-02-07 Thread Andrew Whitworth
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Jonathan Leto wrote: > I would like to just say that "should" is your personal opinion, and not any > formal policy. According to PDD10 (which is no longer in draft) "embedding applications may not use any other functions. ... can have serious implications for app

Fwd: [Announce] GSoC 2011 Announced

2011-02-07 Thread Jonathan Leto
Howdy, Who wants to help with GSoC 2011 ? Duke -- Forwarded message -- From: Carol Smith Date: Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 9:54 AM Subject: [Announce] GSoC 2011 Announced To: Google Summer of Code Mentors List Hi GSoC mentors and org admins, Right on the heels of the end of GCI we'v

Re: Calling a PIR method continuesly from C++ side.

2011-02-07 Thread Jonathan Leto
Howdy, > For embedding situations, you should not be using the Parrot_PMC_morph > or any other functions from the extending API. > I would like to just say that "should" is your personal opinion, and not any formal policy. When I was writing PL/Parrot [0], before the new embed API, the only way

Re: Calling a PIR method continuesly from C++ side.

2011-02-07 Thread Andrew Whitworth
I don't like using VTABLE_morph for this purpose (I don't like VTABLE_morph for any purpose, really). I'm going to refactor this logic out into a separate function and then I'm going to expose it out through the embedding API. For embedding situations, you should not be using the Parrot_PMC_morph

Re: Extra PMC allocations with new ['Integer']

2011-02-07 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 12:55:58PM -0500, Peter Lobsinger wrote: > > I'm sure that some of the PMCs are being created to support the PMCProxy > > instances but *38*?  That number seems surprisingly high, so I > > thought I'd bring it up to the list and see if anyone has any ideas > > about why

Re: Announcing Ωη;)XD

2011-02-07 Thread Bernhard Schmalhofer
Am 07.02.2011 01:41, schrieb George Magklaras: On 02/07/2011 01:30 AM, Jonathan Leto wrote: Howdy, Thanks , but Ω is pronounced 'omaega', not 'ohm'... You cant pronounce some greek letters properly (like η) and not others :-) ... The rest is perfect! Well, I believe the Ω is the SI unit fo