Re: whiteknight/imcc_interfaces branch ready for testing

2011-01-26 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Andy Dougherty wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Andrew Whitworth wrote: > > > The whiteknight/imcc_interfaces branch is ready for general testing. > > > I've tested this branch on my machines with building Parrot and NQP. I > > will run Rakudo tests tonight. Any other testing w

Re: whiteknight/imcc_interfaces branch ready for testing

2011-01-25 Thread James E Keenan
Andrew Whitworth wrote: The whiteknight/imcc_interfaces branch is ready for general testing. See http://nopaste.snit.ch/28945 for some failures in t/examples/pod.t. ___ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev

Re: whiteknight/imcc_interfaces branch ready for testing

2011-01-25 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Andrew Whitworth wrote: > The whiteknight/imcc_interfaces branch is ready for general testing. > I've tested this branch on my machines with building Parrot and NQP. I > will run Rakudo tests tonight. Any other testing would be much > appreciated. On Solaris/SPARC, the build

Re: whiteknight/imcc_interfaces branch ready for testing

2011-01-24 Thread Peter Lobsinger
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Andrew Whitworth wrote: > The whiteknight/imcc_interfaces branch is ready for general testing. > It implements a series of cleanups for the IMCC interface functions, > and should preserve most existing functionality. These changes are the > basis for additional wo

whiteknight/imcc_interfaces branch ready for testing

2011-01-24 Thread Andrew Whitworth
The whiteknight/imcc_interfaces branch is ready for general testing. It implements a series of cleanups for the IMCC interface functions, and should preserve most existing functionality. These changes are the basis for additional work I am doing in this area. Major changes include: * the PIR and P