Re: [parted-devel] CHECK dependency

2006-12-14 Thread Anant Narayanan
> Can the dependency on CHECK be relaxed a bit. eg., if it is not > available on the system configure should not fail, but gracefully > continue without the unittesting support. Committed to master. - Anant ___ parted-devel mailing list parted-devel@li

Re: [parted-devel] CHECK dependency

2006-12-11 Thread Debarshi Ray
But another question, why are you still running FC5? Upgrade to FC6 or rawhide if you're doing development work. Once the next release of FC is out, we won't be doing updates for FC5. Simply because I do not like to disturb the configuration of my system every six months. I do agree that Fedo

Re: [parted-devel] CHECK dependency

2006-12-11 Thread David Cantrell
Debarshi Ray wrote: Can the dependency on CHECK be relaxed a bit. eg., if it is not available on the system configure should not fail, but gracefully continue without the unittesting support. I am suggesting this because the Fedora repositories do not have a version of CHECK >= 0.9.4. The latest

[parted-devel] CHECK dependency

2006-12-11 Thread Debarshi Ray
Can the dependency on CHECK be relaxed a bit. eg., if it is not available on the system configure should not fail, but gracefully continue without the unittesting support. I am suggesting this because the Fedora repositories do not have a version of CHECK >= 0.9.4. The latest is 0.9.3 (http://dow