Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
> All of this can get really sticky, and I fear there are no good,
> general answers. If you do decide to start killing long-running
> threads, I do like the idea of letting the programmer explicitly state
> that the thread should be long running. Do you really have a p
On 2/2/07, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
> > All of this can get really sticky, and I fear there are no good,
> > general answers. If you do decide to start killing long-running
> > threads, I do like the idea of letting the programmer explicitly state
> > tha
Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
>> > All of this can get really sticky, and I fear there are no good,
>> > general answers. If you do decide to start killing long-running
>> > threads, I do like the idea of letting the pr
James Taylor wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> I'm not on the Paste list so I didn't see this thread until it got
> crossposted to pylons. However, I did contribute the thread-pool to
> Paste#httpserver so I suppose I should weigh in.
>
>> When a request comes in and there are no free threads to handle it,
