On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:19:42AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> When I change the status of patches,
> I always do it one by one.
>
> But it is painful if the series consists
> of a bunch of patches.
>
> Does Patchwork have any good way to change the status
> of the whole series?
You can use
Hi.
When I change the status of patches,
I always do it one by one.
But it is painful if the series consists
of a bunch of patches.
Does Patchwork have any good way to change the status
of the whole series?
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
___
Patchwo
Dear Theodore,
In message <20140716102411.gh1...@thunk.org> you wrote:
>
> I wonder if there's some way kernel.org could partner with one of the
> existing mailing list archives so we could have a reliable LKML mail
> archive with stable URL's that can be addressed via message-id.
> Preferably one
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 08:57:32PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>I mostly ask because every now and again patchwork likes to eat 8GB of
>>RAM (and would probably eat more if allowed), and I suspect it's when
>>it's trying to parse or display some of the longer-running threads.
>
>
>
> Actuall
