Re: [PATCH 5/7] Allow use of Docker for development

2016-08-03 Thread Daniel Axtens
>> I considered reverting to Chromium, but that will still require >> chromedriver which (AFAICT) is a closed source blob. > > https://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/chromedriver/contributing would > seem to disagree - it appears it's compiled from within the main > chromium git repo. Derp. Th

Re: [PATCH 5/7] Allow use of Docker for development

2016-08-03 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On 04/08/16 14:55, Daniel Axtens wrote: I considered reverting to Chromium, but that will still require chromedriver which (AFAICT) is a closed source blob. https://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/chromedriver/contributing would seem to disagree - it appears it's compiled from within the main

Re: [PATCH 5/7] Allow use of Docker for development

2016-08-03 Thread Daniel Axtens
Russell Currey writes: > On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 13:44 +1000, Daniel Axtens wrote: >> > >> > Would it be possible to use chromium instead?  It's probably included in >> > distributions and wouldn't require adding a third-party repo, and worse, >> > proprietary software. >> > >> That's a fair poin

Re: [PATCH 5/7] Allow use of Docker for development

2016-08-01 Thread Russell Currey
On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 13:44 +1000, Daniel Axtens wrote: > > > > Would it be possible to use chromium instead?  It's probably included in > > distributions and wouldn't require adding a third-party repo, and worse, > > proprietary software. > > > That's a fair point; I'll have a look. > > Would y

Re: [PATCH 5/7] Allow use of Docker for development

2016-08-01 Thread Daniel Axtens
> Would it be possible to use chromium instead?  It's probably included in > distributions and wouldn't require adding a third-party repo, and worse, > proprietary software. > That's a fair point; I'll have a look. Would you be opposed to switching to firefox? That might be even easier. Regards,

Re: [PATCH 5/7] Allow use of Docker for development

2016-08-01 Thread Russell Currey
On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 10:24 +1000, Daniel Axtens wrote: > This makes it possible to use Docker and docker-compose for development > as an alternative to Vagrant. > > I quite liked vagrant a couple of years ago, but currently: > >  * Trying to install VirtualBox on Ubuntu wants me to disable >    

[PATCH 5/7] Allow use of Docker for development

2016-08-01 Thread Daniel Axtens
This makes it possible to use Docker and docker-compose for development as an alternative to Vagrant. I quite liked vagrant a couple of years ago, but currently: * Trying to install VirtualBox on Ubuntu wants me to disable Secure Boot, and I don't want to do that. * Trying to use the libvir