Actually I just purchased Tapin Radio, at $15 you really can't see that
this purchase will break the bank plus I do like to support those
developers who sell good value for money software.
On 16/11/2014 5:37 PM, Tom Kaufman wrote:
I don't use TR as much as I used to...only because I record a
Ye, I can understand where you're coming from there and that makes
perfect sense.
I haven't been using Total Recorder a lot mainly due to the reasons I
outlined in the first eMail of this discussion but there is still
nothing that equals the recording power of the Total Recorder software
pack
I don't use TR as much as I used to...only because I record a lot with Tapin
Radio when recording audio streams! But I agree whole-heartedly that Total
Recorder is a fine program!
Tom Kaufman
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of ken reed
Se
Hi Dane, I couldn't agree more.
I've been using t r for about 12 years now, and I don't know why there isn't
any excitement about it.
It's the best thing going.
-Original Message-
From: Dane Trethowan
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 5:02 PM
To: PC Audio Discuss
About changing default settings for the driver? I've never done that so
don't know of what the consequences are, everything has just worked here
as stated.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought the Driver was essentual if you
wanted to directly record Internet Radio streams and so on.
On 16
What I'm about to say is my personal point of view but when it comes to
Audacity then I can only say that people just have time to waste.
Yeah sure! its free but all the ucking about that people seem to have to
do to get the thing working when there's stuff like Total Recorder just
sitting the
Yes, its the best program out there I found. Many people don't believe
it. Why should many struggle to use complex stuff like audacity if
this can do such a good job? I understand for advanced stuff you would
go furder but really this help in so many remarks. I like the fact
that you can split file
Hi!
An Audio Engineer friend of mine has been following this discussion and
sends comments regarding Kelly's statement below and Mini PC machines thus.
Hmm; ignoring all the emotive garbage, there *is* at least *some* truth
to the statement, inasmuch as the I5 isn't a patch on the I7: no
hyp
I've just reinstlaled this software onto my Desktop, haven't used Total
Recorder for absolute ages, I've been meaning to reinstall since my
system had a major crash last year bu never got around to doing the job
until now, its like having an old friend back when that software is
handy to the fi
I have to disagree since it is a matter of what you wish to do with the machine.
What I mean by that is that you can buy Macs that are high powered and are more
than capable for audio and video editing.
However, if you decide to buy a budget machine, then that is what you get, an
under powered
I thought the differences between i5 and i& processors were more to do
with the handling of video encoding/decoding and display.
On what do you base your statements regarding audio editing?
I use several computers here, my Windows Desktop is an I5 along with my
iMac, so what am I missing when
It is an i5, which sucks for audio editing. It is doable, but not as
responsive as an i7. I can understand your interest in this machine.
Macs are overpriced and underpowered compared to high performance
Windows machines.
Kelly
On 11/15/14, Kulvinder Bhogal wrote:
> I have configured my Mac
Okay, this is the first time I've used the Witopia VPN clinet under
Windows, up until now I had manually set up my VPN service on Mac and
iPhone, setting up manually on a Windows machines is a little more complex.
It can be done but the Protocol Windows uses is not secure so that's
where the W
I have configured my Mac as it goes. Smiles.
Regards.
Kulvinder
On 15 Nov 2014, at 15:03, Dane Trethowan wrote:
> Interesting you took it that way as its vastely different from a Mac mini,
> try configuring a Mac Mini yourself and see how you get on .
>
> The only similarity between the Nuc
Interesting you took it that way as its vastely different from a Mac
mini, try configuring a Mac Mini yourself and see how you get on .
The only similarity between the Nuc and the Mac Mini are the size of the
machines really, even the entry level Mac Mini is more expensive than a
Nuc though ha
I was simply going by the fact that this is made to look like a Mac Mini and
that is all. Smiles.
Regards.
Kulvinder
On 15 Nov 2014, at 10:19, Dane Trethowan wrote:
> These machines are no pretenders, they’re proper Intel machines, much the
> same as your Desktop or Notebook but one hell of
These machines are no pretenders, they’re proper Intel machines, much the same
as your Desktop or Notebook but one hell of a lot smaller, perfect as the
audio/video hub in your lounge room because of their size, put them literally
anywhere, can you imagine a desktop machine taking up room in you
Here here.
Very well said. Why buy a pretender.
Regards.
Kulvinder
On 15 Nov 2014, at 01:33, Mary Otten wrote:
> Seems too expensive for something you have to add lots of things to,
> like your ram and storage. Buy the Mini and be done with it.
>
> Mary
>
>
18 matches
Mail list logo