Thanks for that.
I did know that the noise cancellation facility of the MM550 wasn’t all that
good, I’ve not tried it as yet and I really don’t care about it all that much
myself .
So the newer model did exactly what I pretty much thought ought to have been
done in the first place, allowed for c
I've just read a review on these and they would be an unmitigated
disaster for anyone who is blind to use.
Firstly the review clearly states that the touch panels - these cans
have two - need to be controlled with precise movement and mistakes are
easily made so - if someone with sight is havi
Hmmm,
since sighted people can't see their ears, how do you think they use the touch
surface?
They use touch.
They are totally usable by sighted and blind people.
Why would a blind person be less able to move their finger up or down or left
or right than a sighted person?
They also sound exc
That's exactly the point, they can't use it too well as the review very
well illustrates.
On 21/09/2016 11:58 AM, Tim Noonan wrote:
Hmmm,
since sighted people can't see their ears, how do you think they use the touch
surface?
They use touch.
They are totally usable by sighted and blind pe
But there was always the
chance you could hit something else.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Tim Noonan
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 9:58 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: The MM 550 was replaced with the very much su
Subject: Re: The MM 550 was replaced with the very much superior PXC 550 Travel
headphones. Re: Bluetooth Headset
I've just read a review on these and they would be an unmitigated disaster for
anyone who is blind to use.
Firstly the review clearly states that the touch panels - these ca
So do you actually have a pair of these cans?
On 21/09/2016 11:58 AM, Tim Noonan wrote:
Hmmm,
since sighted people can't see their ears, how do you think they use the touch
surface?
They use touch.
They are totally usable by sighted and blind people.
Why would a blind person be less able
