Chris Coffey wrote:
Or something similar where files/perms/links aren't kosher to proceed with a
patch. I think this is related to using the safe switch, is that correct?
Correct. Don't use the safe option, and the errors will be gone. You
provide a good example of what --safe can do for you,
Paul B. Henson a écrit :
[snip]
> Perhaps the pain, horror and frustration of Solaris patching will become an
> un-fond memory :)...
I'm also very interested in trying IPS.
One thing that I can't find so far in the documentation is how to roll
back when an update introduced issues. I hope I'm wro
I'll start a new thread adding my hardening question.
How do you handle hardening (JASS) and patching?
Is --safe a good indicator that re-hardening is/maybe needed?
Do you always/never re-harden after patching?
Thanks,
Glen Gunselman
Systems Software Specialist
TCS
Emporia State Unive
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Laurent Blume wrote:
> One thing that I can't find so far in the documentation is how to roll
> back when an update introduced issues. I hope I'm wrong, and that Sun
> didn't take a ?nothing can possibily go wrong, ever, so no need to
> rollback? attitude.
Actually, with ZFS
