Hi Mach,
> From: Mach Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: Huawei
> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:05:26 +0800
> To: Adrian Farrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "pce@ietf.org"
> Cc: JP Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Pce] Two working group last calls
>
> Hi,
>
> Here are some comments about
Dear WG,
We discussed about our rechartering during the PCE WG yesterday and there
was a large consensus for including P2MP (requirements and PCEP protocol
extensions). It is at this point pre-mature to include further items but the
discussion should continue on the ML.
Before finalizing the new
Support.
Regards,
Peng
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 6:33 AM, JP Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear WG,
>
> We discussed about our rechartering during the PCE WG yesterday and there
> was a large consensus for including P2MP (requirements and PCEP protocol
> extensions). It is at this point p
Yes.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jean Philippe Vasseur (jvasseur)
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:33 AM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Pce] Quick Poll on PCE Rechartering
>
> Dear WG,
>
> We discuss
Yes
Tomonori
> Dear WG,
>
> We discussed about our rechartering during the PCE WG yesterday and there
> was a large consensus for including P2MP (requirements and PCEP protocol
> extensions). It is at this point pre-mature to include further items but the
> discussion should continue on the ML.
Yes.
Greg B.
JP Vasseur wrote:
> Dear WG,
>
> We discussed about our rechartering during the PCE WG yesterday and there
> was a large consensus for including P2MP (requirements and PCEP protocol
> extensions). It is at this point pre-mature to include further items but the
> discussion should con
Yes.
Eiji
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:33:11 -0400
JP Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear WG,
>
> We discussed about our rechartering during the PCE WG yesterday and there
> was a large consensus for including P2MP (requirements and PCEP protocol
> extensions). It is at this point pre-mature to
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jean Philippe Vasseur (jvasseur)
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 6:33 AM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Pce] Quick Poll on PCE Rechartering
>
> Dear WG,
>
> We discussed abou
Yes.
Ichiro
> JP Vasseur wrote:
> > Dear WG,
> >
> > We discussed about our rechartering during the PCE WG yesterday and there
> > was a large consensus for including P2MP (requirements and PCEP protocol
> > extensions). It is at this point pre-mature to include further items but the
> > discussi
Yes.
Dan
- Original Message -
From: "JP Vasseur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 6:33 PM
Subject: [Pce] Quick Poll on PCE Rechartering
> Dear WG,
>
> We discussed about our rechartering during the PCE WG yesterday and there
> was a large
Support,
Nurit
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 6:33 AM, JP Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear WG,
>
> We discussed about our rechartering during the PCE WG yesterday and
there
> was a large consensus for including P2MP (requirements and PCEP
protocol
> extensions). It is at this point pre-mature
Yes.
Alberto
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of JP Vasseur
Sent: Wed 3/12/2008 11:33 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Pce] Quick Poll on PCE Rechartering
Dear WG,
We discussed about our rechartering during the PCE WG yesterday and there
wa
Yes.
Kohei
JP Vasseur さんは書きました:
> Dear WG,
>
> We discussed about our rechartering during the PCE WG yesterday and there
> was a large consensus for including P2MP (requirements and PCEP protocol
> extensions). It is at this point pre-mature to include further items but the
> discussion should c
Yes, support.
Autumn
--
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:33:11 -0400
From: JP Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Pce] Quick Poll on PCE Rechartering
To:
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
14 matches
Mail list logo
