Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-tanaka-pce-stateful-pce-mbb-00.txt

Hi, I find the problem statement interesting, how much control plane intelligence you want/need to put in the active stateful with instantiation. My personal opinion is that controlling all the small aspects of the control plane may complicate too much the PCE. The control plane is good at ha

[Pce] Comments on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-02

Hi, Please find the review comments for this draft (there is some overlap with comments from Jon, Cyril etc) *Major Comments:* (1) State synchronisation: a. PCE should determine the synchronisation is over as soon as possible, as updates, request etc are blocked during synchronisation. Maybe the

[Pce] Comments on draft-crabbe-pce-stateful-pce-mpls-te-00

Hi, Please find some review comments for this draft... *(1) PCRpt Message* a. There is a different in RBNF between this and draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-02 b. ::=[]. The status of the paths needs to reported separately in case of standby but we have only one LSP object here to specify the operatio

[Pce] Comments on draft-tanaka-pce-stateful-pce-mbb-0

Hi, Handling of make-before-break was indeed missing from the stateful PCE specs and thanks for this ID, here are a few comments... *(1) One Stroke MBB* a. I wish the handling of this method can be clearly specified in the base stateful PCE draft itself. b. How to handle the case if the signalin

[Pce] Comments on draft-crabbe-pce-stateful-pce-protection-00

Hi, Please find some review comments for this draft... *(1) Introduction* a. There are various cases here, say Passive stateful PCE where the primary and backup path request will be encoded in a separate path request. The handling of LSP-ID here can be described. b. For active stateful PCE (deleg

Re: [Pce] Comments on draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-00

Hi Margaria: Sorry for delayed response. Please see in-line. Thanks Regards Š Zafar -Original Message- From: , "cyril.marga...@nsn.com" Date: Thursday, February 21, 2013 7:44 AM To: "draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-...@tools.ietf.org" , "pce@ietf.org" Subject: Comments on draft

[Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Dear all, There was a good consensus in adopting draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a PCE WG document but as usual, we would like to confirm on the mailing list. Please express your opinion Yes/No (comments welcome too).

[Pce] Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ?

Dear all, There was a good consensus in adopting draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a PCE WG document but as usual, we would like to confirm on the mailing list. Please express your opinion Yes/No (comments welcome too). Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mail

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes, support. Young From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 3:14 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ? Dear all, There was a good consensus in ad

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ?

Yes, support. Young (co-author) From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 3:18 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ? Dear all, There was a good consensu

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes, support as co-author. -Vishwas On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:13 PM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) wrote: > Dear all, > > There was a good consensus in adopting > draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware > as > a PCE WG document but as

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Support. On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:13 PM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) wrote: > Dear all, > > There was a good consensus in adopting > draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware > as > a PCE WG document but as usual, we would like to c

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Support pce working group adoption of this draft. IMHO, it solves most of the problems and meets most requirements of http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te-problem-statement-01.txt and builds upon the foundations of the IGP extensions to do so as described in http://www.ietf.org/

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes! Support! Dhruv (as a co-author) On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:43 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) wrote: > Dear all, > > There was a good consensus in adopting > draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware > as > a PCE WG document but a

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes, support! All the best, Kenichi On 3/12/13 5:13 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) wrote: Dear all, There was a good consensus in adopting draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a PCE WG document but as usual, we would like to c

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes/support Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Cyril Margaria From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:14 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG docu

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes, support! Brgds, DG. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 11, 2013, at 4:13 PM, "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" wrote: > Dear all, > > There was a good consensus in adopting draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as > a PCE WG document but as usual, we would like to confirm on the mailing list. > Please expr

[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ?

Yes/Support. Regards, Xian 发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 JP Vasseur (jvasseur) [jvass...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2013年3月12日 4:17 到: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ? Dear all, There was

[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes, support. Regards, Xian 发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 JP Vasseur (jvasseur) [jvass...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2013年3月12日 4:13 到: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ? Dear all, There

[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes, Support! Dan 发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 JP Vasseur (jvasseur) 发送时间: 2013年3月12日 4:14 收件人: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ? Dear all, There was a good consensus in adopting draft-dhody-pce-pcep-serv

[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ?

Yes, support! Dan 发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 JP Vasseur (jvasseur) 发送时间: 2013年3月12日 4:18 收件人: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ? Dear all, There was a good consensus in adopting draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WGdocument ?

Yes/support (as co-author) Thanks, Kenji <03b78081b371d44390ed6e7badbb4a772332f...@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com> の、 "[Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WGdocument ?" において、 ""JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" "さんは書きまし た： > > > Dear all, > > There was a good consensus in adopti

[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes/Support. Regards, Xian 发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 JP Vasseur (jvasseur) [jvass...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2013年3月12日 4:13 到: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ? Dear all, There

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ?

Support! BR, Huaimo From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 4:18 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ? Dear all, There was a good consensus in adoptin

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Support! BR, Huaimo From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 4:14 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ? Dear all, There was a good consensus in ad

[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes/Support. Thanks Fatai 发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 JP Vasseur (jvasseur) [jvass...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2013年3月12日 4:13 到: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ? Dear all,

[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ?

Yes/Support as a co-author. Thanks Fatai 发件人: pce-boun...@ietf.org [pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 JP Vasseur (jvasseur) [jvass...@cisco.com] 发送时间: 2013年3月12日 4:17 到: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ? D

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Support. Lyndon ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

Yes! Support! Udayasree On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:43 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) wrote: Dear all, There was a good consensus in adopting draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a PCE WG document but as usual, we

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a new WG document ?

There was a good consensus in adopting draft-dhody-pce-pcep-service-aware as a PCE WG document but as usual, we would like to confirm on the Yes, support ___ Pce mailing list Pc

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a new PCE WG Document ?

There was a good consensus in adopting draft-lee-pce-wson-rwa-ext as a PCE WG document but as usual, we would like to confirm on the mailing list. Yes, support (as a co-author) ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p