Hi,
Please find some review comments for draft - PCEP Extensions for Stateful
PCE draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-02
1. In section 5.4 State synchronization
A PCE SHOULD NOT send PCUpd messages to a PCC before State
Synchronization is complete. A PCC SHOULD NOT send PCReq
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the
IETF.
Title : PCEP Extensions for Stateful PCE
Author(s) : Edward Crabbe
Jan
Jon,
Thank you for the detailed comments and for suggesting text offline. Posting
here for the benefit of the list.
The issues were discussed and resolved in a series of in-person meetings at the
ietf, and comments incorporated in version 03 of the draft. Answers inline
below marked ###
Venu,
Thank you for the review. Please see inline below ###.
Ina
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of KONDREDDY
VENUGOPAL REDDY
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 4:58 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Comments on PCEP Extensions for Stateful PCE
Dhruv,
Thank you for the review. Please see answers inline below ###.
Ina
From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv
Dhody
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 8:03 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Comments on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-02
Hi,
Please find the
