[Pce] Question regarding draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-01

Dear authors of draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-01, please find belolw two questions regarding draft draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-01: ― What is the main purpose of this draft? I did not see the use case in your draft. ― "A path profile represents a list of path parameters or policies that a

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG Document?

Support. -- Yosuke -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:12 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG Document? Dear WG, As discussed during the

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

Support. Regards, Tarek On 2014-03-04 5:51 AM, "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" wrote: >Dear WG, > >As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had some support >for adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt >as a PCE WG. > >Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

Support. Cheers G On 04 Mar 2014, at 11:51, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) wrote: > Dear WG, > > As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had some support for > adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt > as a PCE WG. > > Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ?

Support! -- Dorian Davis davis.dor...@aim.com -Original Message- From: Olivier Dugeon To: JP Vasseur (jvasseur) ; pce Sent: Wed, Mar 5, 2014 1:41 pm Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ? support Le 04/03/2014 10:47, JP Vasse

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG Document?

Support! -- Dorian Davis davis.dor...@aim.com -Original Message- From: Olivier Dugeon To: Julien Meuric ; pce Sent: Wed, Mar 5, 2014 1:42 pm Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG Document? support Le 04/03/2014 19:1

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

Support! -- Dorian Davis davis.dor...@aim.com -Original Message- From: Olivier Dugeon To: JP Vasseur (jvasseur) ; pce Sent: Wed, Mar 5, 2014 1:42 pm Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ? support Le 04

Re: [Pce] Question on new IRO type

Ramon, Dhruv, In my opinion, the existing IRO object should be treated as an ordered sequence of hops. It is true that RFC 5440 does not make any statement at all about whether the IRO is ordered. However, we have RFC 5521, which describes the use of the EXRS subobject as follows (section 2.2

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

support Le 04/03/2014 11:51, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) a écrit : Dear WG, As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had some support for adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as a PCE WG. Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of adopting dr

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG Document?

support Le 04/03/2014 19:12, Julien Meuric a écrit : Dear WG, As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today, we had some support for adopting draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-01 as a PCE WG item. Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of adopting it as a WG

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ?

support Le 04/03/2014 10:47, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) a écrit : Dear WG, As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had good support for adopting draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as a WG document, as usual, we would like to confirm on the mailing list. Would you be in favor/opposed (and why i

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document

gt; https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/attachments/20140305/5abcd899/attachment.html> -- Message: 6 Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:27

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG Document?

Support. -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: 04 March 2014 18:12 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG Document? Dear WG, As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today, we

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

Hi Loa: Thanks for the support. Yes, it fills in support for "G"-mpls gaps in draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp, including LSPs for switching types listed by you. Section 2 of the document list along these lines but we can more clarity in future version. Thanks Regards Š Zafar -Original Me

Re: [Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

Support On 4 March 2014 23:30, Qin Wu wrote: > Support. > > -邮件原件- > 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Zafar Ali (zali) > 发送时间: 2014年3月4日 22:22 > 收件人: JP Vasseur (jvasseur); pce@ietf.org > 主题: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt > as PCE WG Docu

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG Document?

Support On 5 March 2014 14:05, Leeyoung wrote: > Support. > > Young > > -Original Message- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 12:12 PM > To: pce@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimiza

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ?

support On 5 March 2014 14:05, Leeyoung wrote: > Support. > > Young > > -Original Message- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 3:48 AM > To: pce@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PC

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

Working Group, I support the adaoption of this document since it addresses a real problem and provide a very good starting point for solving this problem. The document is not entirely clear when it comes to defining "GMPLS LSP", I assume that a GMPLS LSP includes LSPs whith one of the switching

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ?

Support. Young -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 3:48 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ? Dear WG, As discussed during the PCE WG meeting to

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG Document?

Support. Young -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 12:12 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG Document? Dear WG, As discussed during the PCE W

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

Support (as a co-author). On 03/04/2014 11:51 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) wrote: Dear WG, As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had some support for adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as a PCE WG. Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justif

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ?

Support. On 03/04/2014 10:47 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) wrote: Dear WG, As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had good support for adopting draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as a WG document, as usual, we would like to confirm on the mailing list. Would you be in favor/opposed (and why

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG Document?

Support (as a co-author). On 03/04/2014 07:12 PM, Julien Meuric wrote: Dear WG, As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today, we had some support for adopting draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-01 as a PCE WG item. Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of a

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

Support (as coauthor) Best Regards, Oscar Enviado desde mi iPad > El 04/03/2014, a las 10:52, "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" > escribió: > > Dear WG, > > As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had some support for > adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.t

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

Support On 4 Mar 2014, at 10:51 , JP Vasseur (jvasseur) wrote: > Dear WG, > > As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had some support for > adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt > as a PCE WG. > > Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) o

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

I support Gabriele Galimberti Technical Leader Cisco Photonics Srl Via Philips, 12 20900 - Monza (MI) Italy www.cisco.com/global/IT/ ggali...@cisco.com Phone :+39 039 2091462 Mobile :+39 335 7481947 Fax :+39 039 2092049 On 3/4/14 11:51 AM, "JP

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

Support (as co-author) -- Regards, Víctor López (Ph.D.) Telefónica I+D, Global CTO Unit c/ Don Ramón de la Cruz, 82-84. 28006, Madrid (Spain). Phone. +34913128872 Email: vlo...@tid.es Web: https://people.tid.es/Victor.Lopez/ El 05/03/14 08:41, "ramon.casel...@cttc.es" escribió: >Yes,

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ?

Support -- Regards, Víctor López (Ph.D.) Telefónica I+D, Global CTO Unit c/ Don Ramón de la Cruz, 82-84. 28006, Madrid (Spain). Phone. +34913128872 Email: vlo...@tid.es Web: https://people.tid.es/Victor.Lopez/ El 05/03/14 01:38, "Zhangxian (Xian)" escribió: >Support. > >Regards, >Xian