Hi Ben,
> > >If a PCE peer is unwilling or unable to process the ASSOCIATION
> > >object, it MUST return a PCErr message with the Error-Type "Not
> > >supported object" and follow the relevant procedures described in
> > >[RFC5440]. [...]
> > >
> > > Does this imply that the P fl
Hi Dhruv,
Also inline
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 02:17:56PM +, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> Thanks for your review, please see inline..
>
> > --
> > COMMENT:
> > -
Hi Benjamin,
Thanks for your review, please see inline..
> --
> COMMENT:
> --
>
> I'm always a little reluctant to publish framework documents without any
> e
> On Jul 11, 2019, at 2:17 AM, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>
> Hi Suresh,
>
> Agreed, and updated in the working copy.
>
> https://github.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/commit/4cfd450b0cef372c04340aed2d5cb3639887f631
Thanks Dhruv. Looks good to me.
Regards
Suresh
_
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please re
Noted. Updated in working copy.
https://github.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/commit/332ecadd8db5277cc52ad133cd4363e6aacd66c8#diff-053646eff5c15d4158c296a6542e2ba2
> -Original Message-
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adam Roach via
> Datatracker
> Sent: 11 July 2019
