Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the feedback, yes I think we can use absence of LSP object to mean
“truly stateless” PCReq.
To WG,
Also wanted to address a couple of comments that were mentioned about
Association being a container for Tunnels vs container for LSPs. The reason why
we said it’s a contain
Hi Jeff, and WG,
To follow up on your comment about making these 2 separate documents: one for
ECMP within a single LSP and another for ECMP among different LSPs.
That may be a good idea, since the mechanisms for achieving these two are quite
different, so they are better kept separate. Just as
Mike,
Thanks for the consideration.
That was exactly my point, having a number of different drafts that are short,
concise and focused on a particular problem has always been my preference.
The use cases are different, while they don’t conflict they are also don’t
“require” each other. It is per
