I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft.
Thanks,
Siva
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 11:49 AM Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
wrote:
> Hi Authors,
>
> In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all
> authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance
> with IET
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft.
Thanks
Hooman
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 11:49 AM
To: Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) ; msiva...@gmail.com; Colby
Barth ; pengshup...@huawei.com; Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia -
CA/Ottawa)
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: IPR Poll
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft.
Best regards,
Shuping
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@netflix.com]
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 11:49 PM
To: Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) ; msiva...@gmail.com; Colby
Barth ; Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
; hooman.bidg...@nokia.com
Cc: pce
Hi PCE Chairs,
As one of the authors, I support WG adoption of the current draft.
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your valuable input, let me reply.
1. It would be up to the head-end to decide what CP is active, so I would say
that we probably do not need to explicitly state in this draft that only one
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft.
--Colby
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
Date: Monday, June 8, 2020 at 11:49 AM
To: "Mike Koldychev (mkoldych)" , "msiva...@gmail.com"
, Colby Barth ,
"pengshup...@huawei.com" , "hooman.bidg...@nokia.com"
Cc: "pce@ietf.org"
Subject: IPR Pol
Hi PCE Chairs and WG
A few questions/comments regarding draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06:
1. draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy states that only a single
candidate path can be active within an SR Policy. While we wouldn't want to
repeat all the text in the PCEP document that
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft.
Thanks,
Mike.
From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 11:49 AM
To: Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) ; msiva...@gmail.com; Colby
Barth ; pengshup...@huawei.com; hooman.bidg...@nokia.com
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: IPR Poll on draft-ba
Hi Authors,
In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all
authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance
with IETF IPR rules.
Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be discl
