[Pce] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-04.txt

A new version (-04) has been submitted for draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-04.txt The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-sec

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir

Hi WG, The WG LC is closed, we have support to move the document along the publication process. Thanks to everyone who responded. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 10:46 PM Dhruv Dhody wrote: > > Hi WG, > > This email starts a working group last call for > draft-ietf-pce-associatio

[Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.

Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02 Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed b

[Pce] The PCE WG has placed draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

The PCE WG has placed draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Dhruv Dhody) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement/ ___ Pce ma

[Pce] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-07

Hi authors of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller, Please find below my review of the aforementioned I-D. Regards, Julien --- *Main Concerns* - From a PCECC operation stand point, it feels odd that what is referred to as "basic PCECC LSP setup" is actually PCC triggered, whereas

[Pce] IPR Poll on draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02

Hi Authors, In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR rules. Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of: I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be discl

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.

Hello, As co-author, I support the adoption. Document describes various use case needs, has implementations, and has been updated based on existing feedback. Would be good to have adopted to move to early IANA codepoint allocations to allow implementation to progress further, as well as furthe

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02

Hi Hari and WG, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Thanks Andrew From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 3:42 PM To: "Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" , "Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/O

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02.

Hi, I have read the latest version of this document and I support WG adoption. It's useful for finer control of TI-LFA protection for SR-TE Policy. Thanks, Mike. -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2020 9:41 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [P

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-stone-pce-local-protection-enforcement-02

Hi Hari, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Regards, Mustapha. From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2020 3:42 PM To: Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) ; Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) ;