Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

2021-03-19 Thread Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Hi all, Overall Support WGLC. It's an important document in the world of SRTE, and the document goes to good lengths to describe the various scenarios and combinations. Only one question I have for the authors and WG, for any further clarification on the following text (section 4): The ab

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07

2021-03-19 Thread Siva Sivabalan
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed. Thanks, Siva On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:53 PM Jeff Tantsura wrote: > Hi Hari, > > I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed. > > > Regards, > Jeff > > On Mar 18, 2021, at 10:10, Harih

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07

2021-03-19 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Hi Hari, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed. Regards, Jeff > On Mar 18, 2021, at 10:10, Hariharan Ananthakrishnan wrote: > >  > Hi Authors, > > In preparation for WG Last Call on this draft, I'd like all > authors and contributors to confirm on the li

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

2021-03-19 Thread olivier.dugeon
Hi all, I support adoption of this draft, but I have a certain number of questions for the authors:  - As far as I know, routers manage their MPLS label allocation by interface,    except for Segment Routing which uses an SRGB. In the draft, you mention    that the BSID, associated with a given L

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07

2021-03-19 Thread Mike Koldychev (mkoldych)
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Thanks, Mike. From: Pce On Behalf Of Hariharan Ananthakrishnan Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 1:10 PM To: c...@huawei.com; Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil) ; jefftant.i...@gmail.com; msiv